In 2012, one topic dominated: predictive coding (aka technology-assisted review or computer-assisted review). So it’s a safe bet that as we gather at the Hilton New York for LegalTech 2013, it will be front and center.
But there is one sure sign that electronic data discovery is maturing: We’re starting to hear a bit more loudly from the skeptics. Perhaps "skeptics" is too severe a label; "cautious" may be a better moniker. I doubt that anyone under the age of 75 would seriously propose that TAR be abandoned, but credible folks are suggesting that we just might want to shift out of overdrive. Speed, after all, can have unfortunate consequences, they argue. Among those waving the yellow caution flag is United States District Court Magistrate Judge James C. Francis IV, of the Southern District of New York. In our Communiqué column, Francis calls for more "Judicial Modesty" when it comes to e-discovery. Jurists might want to hesitate before they jump into technology decision-making in cases. "At some point," he says, "judicial intervention morphs into judicial interference and ends up as a net burden on the litigation."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]