Apple did not succeed in its attempt to dismiss a Second Amended Class Action Complaint in which the plaintiff alleged that Apple failed to prevent third-party applications on Apple devices from uploading user information without their consent. Maria Pirozzi v. Apple, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-0152 (N.D. Cal., August 3, 2013). The plaintiff’s claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False and Misleading Advertising Law (FAL) and Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) were allowed to go forward, as was her negligent misrepresentation claim. Her unjust enrichment claim was dismissed.
THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
