As the creators of e-discovery’s ubiquitous Electronic Discovery Reference Model prepare for a transition for both themselves and their popular schematic model for the e-discovery process, the time is right to consider how we’ve used — or misused — the EDRM. In our recent 451 Research report, ” Abandoning the EDRM: A Legal-Regulatory Market Ripe for Change,” my colleague, Alan Pelz-Sharpe, (research director for content management and collaboration) and I consider how legal technology vendors have used the EDRM to do things nature never intended.
DEMYSTIFYING THE PROCESS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
