On Sept. 5, the Delaware Court of Chancery, on a matter of first impression, ruled that a director’s emails with his personal attorney were not privileged because the director used his company email address to communicate with counsel and he was aware of the company’s policy that all work emails were accessible by the company.
The court emphasized in In re Information Management Services Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 8168-VCL, slip op. (Del. Ch. Ct. Sept. 5, 2013), that its holding was limited to its facts and that in different factual settings the outcome might be different. Nonetheless, the court’s decision raises uncertainties, at least in Delaware, about preservation of privilege, which has important implications for directors and their counsel, particularly for directors who serve on special committees that have retained separate, independent counsel. As with all issues of privilege, it is best to err on the side of caution, and in light of the court’s decision in Information Management, directors and their independent counsel should be mindful of the following issues:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
