Editor’s note: Richard Levie, is a retired associate judge in the District of Columbia’s Superior Court. He now works for JAMS, based in Washington, D.C., as a “neutral.”

With the explosion of electronic data discovery, courts and practitioners have struggled to manage cases in a cost-efficient manner. Efforts to reduce costs include promoting cooperation, proportionality, technology assisted review—or just a truce to avoid EDD. Despite these efforts, discovery disputes will probably never go away. (Some responses were lightly edited for clarity.)

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]