Electronic discovery focuses heavily on producing accurate results for opposing counsel. Identifying privileged information may well be the biggest target for e-discovery. In distant second place comes the effort put forth by producing parties to cull non-relevant data from the set. Sure, some lawyers do invest time and resources removing clearly non-relevant data from the set but marking documents relevant to the case would be much like tipping a strong hand in a poker game. Culling the data based on relevancy would be very risky;the producing lawyer doesn’t know what opposing council views as non-relevant beyond common characteristics such as: custodians, dates, and the broad issues at hand.
Predictive Coding Fills the Glass
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
