Here’s a quick quiz: Who were the law firms who have worked on the numerous Apple v. Samsung court battles? In fact, I’ll even make this an open note quiz, and you can use any platform you’d like.
Now… headed to PACER, aren’t you? That’s reasonable, considering the breadth of the U.S. government’s Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) platform. However, one legal technology company is looking to enter PACER’s territory, bringing with it features that it believes sets it apart from other case information technologies.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
