Many technology companies are clamoring to claim an artificial intelligence (AI) basis for their product, especially given the pull AI products seem to have with investors , but many fail to consider whether AI is actually the best solution to the problem they’re hoping to solve. When TurboPatent announced that its latest patent drafting software, RoboReview, would be an AI-enabled product, I initially assumed that the product would fall into this bucket of startups frantically trying to weave the words “artificial intelligence” into its marketing.
However, patenting may actually be one of the best fits for artificial intelligence in the legal profession—patents are rife with technical language and often are held up at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) by basic procedural writing gaffes, which makes them a great candidate for algorithmic sorting.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
