A New Jersey appeals court on Monday upheld a judge’s sanction of Roseland’s Brach Eichler for failing to take adequate precautions to prevent disappearance of attorney-client emails sought in discovery in a litigation matter.
The ruling, in Goldmark v. Mellina, A-5918-10, is a lesson to lawyers and litigants that even if communications are asserted to be privileged, there is an obligation to preserve them and to disclose them to the court, if required, for in camera inspection.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
