Federal custodians of electronic records in a Freedom of Information Act case must provide a detailed description of their searches for responsive documents, the search words used, and whether the search words are effective, Judge Shira Scheindlin of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled.

Ruling in a massive FOIA action seeking documents on the federal policy of obtaining fingerprints from state and local arrestees for a national immigration database, Scheindlin faulted the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies for failing to provide affidavits that, in the words of the law, “contain reasonable specificity of detail rather than merely conclusory statements.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]