The Biggest Global Compliance Challenges for 2013

Everyone loves Top 10 lists and year-in-review summaries as a new year begins. In the compliance world, there is much to report from 2012. The year was punctuated by dramatic allegations about Wal-Mart’s wrongdoing in Mexico and beyond. Morgan Stanley’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act declination provided a detailed example of what an antibribery compliance program should look like for companies seeking to avoid prosecution. Corporate whistleblowers are on the rise. The facilitation payment exception is in decline. And, at last, the U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission published their FCPA guidance, which brought little comfort but some clarity to the compliance community.

So much for 2012.

Moving into the new year, most U.S. compliance professionals will continue to slog forward, refining their vetting processes for third parties, making their training more relevant to their employees’ experience, improving their internal reporting processes, bolstering their IP and data privacy protection, and lobbying with variable success for the resources they’ll need to do all that is expected of them.

Our compliance community is pretty far down in the weeds and so, rather than parsing priorities further, we’ve looked outside the United States to see how our colleagues in other countries are preparing for 2013. My firm TRACE reached out to a handful of partner law firms in less-discussed locations and asked what issue they expect to present the greatest compliance challenge in their jurisdictions in the year ahead. We received a surprising range of responses.

In Angola, Ana Pinelas Pinto of Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados, expects the greatest challenge of 2013 to be compliance with the new rules governing trading in influence and private sector corruption, both a part of that country’s new Criminal Code, still under preparation.

Similarly, Pinto expects the greatest compliance challenge in Mozambique to be the enforcement of the new Public Probity Law, which sets forth updated rules on the conduct of anyone vested with public powers.

Jonida Braja of Wolf Theiss in Albania expects to see reform of the judiciary in order to improve its impartiality and efficiency, especially in the lead up to the next parliamentary elections, which are scheduled for June.

Several anticorruption experts are most concerned about tax enforcement and evasion. David Sargsyan of Ameria expects the compliance community in Armenia to face considerable hurdles as companies struggle to comply with newly enforced tax legislation. Similarly, Dimitris Zepos of Zepos & Yannopoulos expects Greece’s greatest compliance challenge to be the implementation of procedures relating to combating tax evasion, alongside efforts toward greater transparency in public procurement. Laura Medina of Jiménez Cruz Peña in the Dominican Republic lists controlling tax evasion in the wake of recent tax reforms in her top three challenges for 2013.

Medina also worries about the investigation and prosecution of corruption cases against public officials from past administrations, especially given that the attorney general (the head of the Ministerio Público—the authority responsible for investigating and prosecuting crimes) is appointed by the president and is a partisan of the elected political party.

Marjan Poljak of Karanovic & Nikolic believes that compliance experts in both Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro will be focused on the harmonization of local legislation with the E.U. legislation and then the enforcement of these laws.

Internal harmonization was emphasized by Kemal Mamak of Hergüner Bilgen Özeke in Turkey, particularly with respect to harmonization of the governance and corporate documents of corporations with the new mandatory provisions of the Turkish Commercial Code, which entered into force on July 1, 2012.

The issue of access to information was raised by only one compliance expert. Dr. Diego Martín-Menjívar of the Consortium Centro América Abogados, expects the greatest compliance challenge in El Salvador to be the final integration of the Institute of Access to Public Information. Although enacted in mid-2011, the Public Information Access Law has suffered because the president of El Salvador has failed to appoint the five commissioners to the institute as required by the law. As a result, the law still has not been fully implemented.