Suffolk Law Launches 'Legal Innovation & Technology' Program for Legal Professionals
The school's new certificate program will offer coursework on concepts like Design Thinking and Process Improvement for a wide range of legal professionals.
November 03, 2017 at 10:08 AM
3 minute read
Suffolk University Law School Sargent Hall, in Boston, MA.
Suffolk University Law School this week announced the launch of an online certificate program in “Legal Innovation & Technology” designed to help legal professionals think more broadly about potential applications of technology in law practice.
Suffolk Law Dean Andrew Perlman explained that the program aims to bring the kind of issue spotting that law students traditionally learn to identify in property law or contracts to technology. If students can understand what processes and procedures lend themselves to automation or expert systems, they may be better able to establish them in legal practices.
“When they see an issue in practice they can say, 'you know what, there is a better, faster and cheaper way to do this.' What I'm hoping is that people will recognize there isn't just an off-the-shelf solution to make a law firm or legal service organization more efficient. There needs to be a mindset change,” Perlman said.
The program will begin offering two classes each academic term starting in June 2018, including courses such as “Legal Operations,” “21st Century Legal Profession,” “Process Improvement & Legal Project Management,” “Design Thinking for Legal Professionals,” “Legal Technology Toolkit,” and “The Business of Delivering Legal Services.” Each course in the certificate program takes around 10 weeks to complete, and will contain roughly an hour of content each week. Students can access course material online either along a fixed course schedule or on their own time.
Perlman noted that these courses are a combination of popular course offerings among Suffolk Law students and a survey of industry professionals. The program, he explained, is geared toward “advancing a new mindset on how to deliver better legal services, and help legal professionals of all kinds do what they do better, faster and cheaper.”
Perlman explained that using technology to teach curriculum on the use of technology was sort of a no-brainer. Additionally, the program's structure opens up content to legal professionals who may not have time to sit through a standard course. “We want to give as much flexibility as possible to the students,” Perlman said.
Perlman noted that Suffolk's new certificate program is aimed at a broad set of “legal professionals,” such as those from corporate legal departments, legal operations departments, innovation officers, and paralegals.
Although Suffolk Law is running the program, course instructors for the Legal Innovation & Technology program will come mostly from outside the university. Law21 principal Jordan Furlong, assistant general counsel of Microsoft Lucy Bassli, and Harvard Law School Access to Justice Lab associate director of field research Erika Rickard are each slated to prepare content for courses in the program.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250