Yerra Expands Managed Services Offering With Eye on Legal Ops
The new Yerra Clearly service will expand beyond just e-billing to also manage a legal department's contract, KM, and legal intake processes.
November 10, 2017 at 01:47 PM
8 minute read
As corporate legal departments struggle with the costs and management of legal technology, managed legal service providers have been stepping in to offer alternative options for in-house tech deployment. And as the market for these services grow, such companies are seeking to differentiate by providing targeted legal expertise and more comprehensive offerings.
Among those providers is Yerra Solutions, which this week announced the release of its managed services offering Yerra Clearly. With its launch, the company hopes to provide a new level of service that essentially allows legal departments to outsource all their legal operations.
What it is: Yerra Clearly is a suite of managed services covering contract management, legal request intake, e-billing, and knowledge management (KM). Clients can chose to deploy each service individually or leverage them all in a full suite called Clearly Legal Ops.
Aditya Prakash, chief innovation officer and head of client services at Yerra Solutions, said that the new offering is an evolution of Clearly 1.0, which was a service focused specifically on managing e-billing for Yerra's European clients.
Yerra, however, soon realized that this managed services approach “really resonates” with legal departments, and “can be applied to many more use cases than just e-billing and invoice management,” he said.
How it works: Yerra Clearly provides legal departments with teams of legal and technology experts to handle all their administrative and data-intensive tasks.
For example, the Clearly Contracts service provides a team to manage potentially everything from contract intake and organization to contract drafting and key clause extraction, depending on what a client specifically requests.
Similarly, the Clearly Spend for Legal and Clearly Spend for IP service teams manage the intake, organization and coding of all an organization's legal invoices. “The end result is that clients get 100 percent of the global invoices in one systems with deep analytics behind it,” Prakash said.
Likewise, Clearly KM manages the intake and organization of knowledge assets, while Clearly Demand acts as a middle man to triage and manage requests that come in to the legal department.
In many cases, Clearly service teams use their own proprietary technology, but can also use the technology clients already have in place. Legal departments can choose for only Clearly teams to interface and manage the technology or can choose to interface with the technology themselves.
Bring in the AI: In many cases, Clearly teams will use the data it obtains from the legal departments to train machine learning tools that eventually will allow them to work faster and more efficiently.
In performing contracts tasks, for example, Clearly teams continuously run the contracts through a machine learning system. This allows the system to eventually create benchmark data, such as what terms are standard in the legal department's contracts, and leverage that toward tasks like quickly finding anomalies with new contracts.
Eventually, the goal is to introduce a high level of automation into legal service like contract analytics. “We start with 80/20 start of premise, where 80 percent of that work is being handled by the service team and 20 is being handed by the system. And as more data gets into the systems, the paradigm starts shifting to basically where we expect it to be 80/20 the other way,” Prakash said.
Competition: With Clearly, Yerra enters an increasingly crowded legal technology managed services market. The company will have to compete with others like FTI Consulting, Elevate Services, Pramata and Riverview Law, all of whom deploy artificial intelligence in one way or another.
Prakash, however, believes Yerra's Clearly stands out because it is a “services wrapped around technology” offering, including a team of highly specialized legal experts.
“We bring in legal experts specifically to industries and specific to regions,” he said, adding that the legal teams are well versed in all the legal, regulatory and technology issues their clients face.
Given their expertise, Prakash noted that such teams will come into the engagement without having to be trained or managed extensively by the legal department. So while Clearly teams do “ask for guidance” in terms of how they should proceed with certain legal services, “it's not like we come in with a blank slate,” he said.
As corporate legal departments struggle with the costs and management of legal technology, managed legal service providers have been stepping in to offer alternative options for in-house tech deployment. And as the market for these services grow, such companies are seeking to differentiate by providing targeted legal expertise and more comprehensive offerings.
Among those providers is Yerra Solutions, which this week announced the release of its managed services offering Yerra Clearly. With its launch, the company hopes to provide a new level of service that essentially allows legal departments to outsource all their legal operations.
What it is: Yerra Clearly is a suite of managed services covering contract management, legal request intake, e-billing, and knowledge management (KM). Clients can chose to deploy each service individually or leverage them all in a full suite called Clearly Legal Ops.
Aditya Prakash, chief innovation officer and head of client services at Yerra Solutions, said that the new offering is an evolution of Clearly 1.0, which was a service focused specifically on managing e-billing for Yerra's European clients.
Yerra, however, soon realized that this managed services approach “really resonates” with legal departments, and “can be applied to many more use cases than just e-billing and invoice management,” he said.
How it works: Yerra Clearly provides legal departments with teams of legal and technology experts to handle all their administrative and data-intensive tasks.
For example, the Clearly Contracts service provides a team to manage potentially everything from contract intake and organization to contract drafting and key clause extraction, depending on what a client specifically requests.
Similarly, the Clearly Spend for Legal and Clearly Spend for IP service teams manage the intake, organization and coding of all an organization's legal invoices. “The end result is that clients get 100 percent of the global invoices in one systems with deep analytics behind it,” Prakash said.
Likewise, Clearly KM manages the intake and organization of knowledge assets, while Clearly Demand acts as a middle man to triage and manage requests that come in to the legal department.
In many cases, Clearly service teams use their own proprietary technology, but can also use the technology clients already have in place. Legal departments can choose for only Clearly teams to interface and manage the technology or can choose to interface with the technology themselves.
Bring in the AI: In many cases, Clearly teams will use the data it obtains from the legal departments to train machine learning tools that eventually will allow them to work faster and more efficiently.
In performing contracts tasks, for example, Clearly teams continuously run the contracts through a machine learning system. This allows the system to eventually create benchmark data, such as what terms are standard in the legal department's contracts, and leverage that toward tasks like quickly finding anomalies with new contracts.
Eventually, the goal is to introduce a high level of automation into legal service like contract analytics. “We start with 80/20 start of premise, where 80 percent of that work is being handled by the service team and 20 is being handed by the system. And as more data gets into the systems, the paradigm starts shifting to basically where we expect it to be 80/20 the other way,” Prakash said.
Competition: With Clearly, Yerra enters an increasingly crowded legal technology managed services market. The company will have to compete with others like
Prakash, however, believes Yerra's Clearly stands out because it is a “services wrapped around technology” offering, including a team of highly specialized legal experts.
“We bring in legal experts specifically to industries and specific to regions,” he said, adding that the legal teams are well versed in all the legal, regulatory and technology issues their clients face.
Given their expertise, Prakash noted that such teams will come into the engagement without having to be trained or managed extensively by the legal department. So while Clearly teams do “ask for guidance” in terms of how they should proceed with certain legal services, “it's not like we come in with a blank slate,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Class Action Accusing Dave's Killer Bread of Mislabeling Protein Contents Cleared to Continue, Judge Rules
- 2SEC Files Lawsuit Against Elon Musk Over Untimely Twitter Ownership Disclosure
- 3Survey Finds Majority of Legal Professionals Still Intimidated by AI Despite Need to Streamline Mounting Caseloads
- 4FTC Launches Inquiry of Single-Family Rental Home 'Mega Investors,' Issues PBM Report
- 5Womble Bond Dickinson's Wilmington Office Sees New Leadership as Merger Is Completed
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250