Orrick Labs to Build Law Firm Technology In-House
The firm's new in-house technology incubator plans to work toward a document management system and dashboard to help the firm boost efficiency.
November 20, 2017 at 11:30 AM
10 minute read
Silicon Valley stalwart law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has launched Orrick Labs, an in-house technology incubator tasked with developing efficiency technology for the firm. The “lab” is currently working on a firm-wide document management dashboard platform and intends to develop other technology to support firm operations.
Jackson Ratcliffe, technology architect for Orrick Labs, explained that the idea for the incubator derived originally from the technology strategy at Venture Law Group, a firm that rode the boom and bust of the late 90s dot-com wave. “Their whole focus was they had the most advanced tech that any law firm could have,” Ratcliffe said, noting that the firm was one of the first to embrace email and client-facing document management. Many Venture Law Group veterans, including Ratcliffe, landed at Orrick in hopes of building a similar strategy for the firm.
Ratcliffe's first project for the firm was a comprehensive dashboard system tailored to Orrick's Technology Companies Group, displaying key information and documents for clients in a given matter all at once. “That project has gone extremely well. We have almost 900 clients set up on it now. Now they want more,” he said.
That “more” resulted in a set of internal conversations about potential technology solutions. Ratcliffe suggested that to really capitalize on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-based cybersecurity infrastructure, the firm had to begin developing cloud-based strategies.
“If we really want to go to the next level and do all the things we read about in the news rags, AI and such, we need to do more,” Ratcliffe said. “The on-premise solution we were using, I just couldn't do anything more with it.”
Orrick signed off on Orrick Labs to support some of this new technology development. After hiring on two additional technical staff people, the Orrick Labs team is now hard at work building out the infrastructure for further technology to be built upon.
“The three of us are building a next generation platform to better organize legal documents for clients and at the matter level,” Ratcliffe explained. While Ratcliffe's dashboard project was initially designed for the Technology Companies Group, Orrick Labs' next project intends to build out technology accessible across the firm. “Any practice group, if they need a collaborative site, they can provision it,” he said.
“Ultimately, the goal is to make sure all the information we have internally is presented on this dashboard. It's a lot of internal confidential data; we want to make sure we respect our clients privacy and confidentiality,” Ratcliffe added.
While sexier technology like AI-based contract analysis drive a lot of excitement, Ratcliffe explained that implementing that technology without having the right infrastructure in place isn't particularly useful, and it certainly can't be done with legacy on-premise tools many firms rely on.
“You can't build AI with on-premise tools. You have to be using these big neural networks that the big vendors have,” he explained.
Many legal technology startups are looking to design and sell technology similar to what Orrick Labs aims to build, but Ratcliffe explained that there are key reasons to develop and tailor that technology in-house. “The biggest reason is integration with existing systems. Right now, if you look at most law firms, the sites or services they have for these collaborations are islands unto themselves,” he explained.
Ratcliffe noted that practice group leaders are eager to contribute ideas and feedback to Orrick Labs' technology. “The tone and interest and excitement is very high. It's really a firm project, and culturally Orrick is committed to it,” he said.
Silicon Valley stalwart law firm
Jackson Ratcliffe, technology architect for Orrick Labs, explained that the idea for the incubator derived originally from the technology strategy at Venture Law Group, a firm that rode the boom and bust of the late 90s dot-com wave. “Their whole focus was they had the most advanced tech that any law firm could have,” Ratcliffe said, noting that the firm was one of the first to embrace email and client-facing document management. Many Venture Law Group veterans, including Ratcliffe, landed at Orrick in hopes of building a similar strategy for the firm.
Ratcliffe's first project for the firm was a comprehensive dashboard system tailored to Orrick's Technology Companies Group, displaying key information and documents for clients in a given matter all at once. “That project has gone extremely well. We have almost 900 clients set up on it now. Now they want more,” he said.
That “more” resulted in a set of internal conversations about potential technology solutions. Ratcliffe suggested that to really capitalize on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-based cybersecurity infrastructure, the firm had to begin developing cloud-based strategies.
“If we really want to go to the next level and do all the things we read about in the news rags, AI and such, we need to do more,” Ratcliffe said. “The on-premise solution we were using, I just couldn't do anything more with it.”
Orrick signed off on Orrick Labs to support some of this new technology development. After hiring on two additional technical staff people, the Orrick Labs team is now hard at work building out the infrastructure for further technology to be built upon.
“The three of us are building a next generation platform to better organize legal documents for clients and at the matter level,” Ratcliffe explained. While Ratcliffe's dashboard project was initially designed for the Technology Companies Group, Orrick Labs' next project intends to build out technology accessible across the firm. “Any practice group, if they need a collaborative site, they can provision it,” he said.
“Ultimately, the goal is to make sure all the information we have internally is presented on this dashboard. It's a lot of internal confidential data; we want to make sure we respect our clients privacy and confidentiality,” Ratcliffe added.
While sexier technology like AI-based contract analysis drive a lot of excitement, Ratcliffe explained that implementing that technology without having the right infrastructure in place isn't particularly useful, and it certainly can't be done with legacy on-premise tools many firms rely on.
“You can't build AI with on-premise tools. You have to be using these big neural networks that the big vendors have,” he explained.
Many legal technology startups are looking to design and sell technology similar to what Orrick Labs aims to build, but Ratcliffe explained that there are key reasons to develop and tailor that technology in-house. “The biggest reason is integration with existing systems. Right now, if you look at most law firms, the sites or services they have for these collaborations are islands unto themselves,” he explained.
Ratcliffe noted that practice group leaders are eager to contribute ideas and feedback to Orrick Labs' technology. “The tone and interest and excitement is very high. It's really a firm project, and culturally Orrick is committed to it,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
