Orrick Labs to Build Law Firm Technology In-House
The firm's new in-house technology incubator plans to work toward a document management system and dashboard to help the firm boost efficiency.
November 20, 2017 at 11:30 AM
10 minute read
Silicon Valley stalwart law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe has launched Orrick Labs, an in-house technology incubator tasked with developing efficiency technology for the firm. The “lab” is currently working on a firm-wide document management dashboard platform and intends to develop other technology to support firm operations.
Jackson Ratcliffe, technology architect for Orrick Labs, explained that the idea for the incubator derived originally from the technology strategy at Venture Law Group, a firm that rode the boom and bust of the late 90s dot-com wave. “Their whole focus was they had the most advanced tech that any law firm could have,” Ratcliffe said, noting that the firm was one of the first to embrace email and client-facing document management. Many Venture Law Group veterans, including Ratcliffe, landed at Orrick in hopes of building a similar strategy for the firm.
Ratcliffe's first project for the firm was a comprehensive dashboard system tailored to Orrick's Technology Companies Group, displaying key information and documents for clients in a given matter all at once. “That project has gone extremely well. We have almost 900 clients set up on it now. Now they want more,” he said.
That “more” resulted in a set of internal conversations about potential technology solutions. Ratcliffe suggested that to really capitalize on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-based cybersecurity infrastructure, the firm had to begin developing cloud-based strategies.
“If we really want to go to the next level and do all the things we read about in the news rags, AI and such, we need to do more,” Ratcliffe said. “The on-premise solution we were using, I just couldn't do anything more with it.”
Orrick signed off on Orrick Labs to support some of this new technology development. After hiring on two additional technical staff people, the Orrick Labs team is now hard at work building out the infrastructure for further technology to be built upon.
“The three of us are building a next generation platform to better organize legal documents for clients and at the matter level,” Ratcliffe explained. While Ratcliffe's dashboard project was initially designed for the Technology Companies Group, Orrick Labs' next project intends to build out technology accessible across the firm. “Any practice group, if they need a collaborative site, they can provision it,” he said.
“Ultimately, the goal is to make sure all the information we have internally is presented on this dashboard. It's a lot of internal confidential data; we want to make sure we respect our clients privacy and confidentiality,” Ratcliffe added.
While sexier technology like AI-based contract analysis drive a lot of excitement, Ratcliffe explained that implementing that technology without having the right infrastructure in place isn't particularly useful, and it certainly can't be done with legacy on-premise tools many firms rely on.
“You can't build AI with on-premise tools. You have to be using these big neural networks that the big vendors have,” he explained.
Many legal technology startups are looking to design and sell technology similar to what Orrick Labs aims to build, but Ratcliffe explained that there are key reasons to develop and tailor that technology in-house. “The biggest reason is integration with existing systems. Right now, if you look at most law firms, the sites or services they have for these collaborations are islands unto themselves,” he explained.
Ratcliffe noted that practice group leaders are eager to contribute ideas and feedback to Orrick Labs' technology. “The tone and interest and excitement is very high. It's really a firm project, and culturally Orrick is committed to it,” he said.
Silicon Valley stalwart law firm
Jackson Ratcliffe, technology architect for Orrick Labs, explained that the idea for the incubator derived originally from the technology strategy at Venture Law Group, a firm that rode the boom and bust of the late 90s dot-com wave. “Their whole focus was they had the most advanced tech that any law firm could have,” Ratcliffe said, noting that the firm was one of the first to embrace email and client-facing document management. Many Venture Law Group veterans, including Ratcliffe, landed at Orrick in hopes of building a similar strategy for the firm.
Ratcliffe's first project for the firm was a comprehensive dashboard system tailored to Orrick's Technology Companies Group, displaying key information and documents for clients in a given matter all at once. “That project has gone extremely well. We have almost 900 clients set up on it now. Now they want more,” he said.
That “more” resulted in a set of internal conversations about potential technology solutions. Ratcliffe suggested that to really capitalize on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-based cybersecurity infrastructure, the firm had to begin developing cloud-based strategies.
“If we really want to go to the next level and do all the things we read about in the news rags, AI and such, we need to do more,” Ratcliffe said. “The on-premise solution we were using, I just couldn't do anything more with it.”
Orrick signed off on Orrick Labs to support some of this new technology development. After hiring on two additional technical staff people, the Orrick Labs team is now hard at work building out the infrastructure for further technology to be built upon.
“The three of us are building a next generation platform to better organize legal documents for clients and at the matter level,” Ratcliffe explained. While Ratcliffe's dashboard project was initially designed for the Technology Companies Group, Orrick Labs' next project intends to build out technology accessible across the firm. “Any practice group, if they need a collaborative site, they can provision it,” he said.
“Ultimately, the goal is to make sure all the information we have internally is presented on this dashboard. It's a lot of internal confidential data; we want to make sure we respect our clients privacy and confidentiality,” Ratcliffe added.
While sexier technology like AI-based contract analysis drive a lot of excitement, Ratcliffe explained that implementing that technology without having the right infrastructure in place isn't particularly useful, and it certainly can't be done with legacy on-premise tools many firms rely on.
“You can't build AI with on-premise tools. You have to be using these big neural networks that the big vendors have,” he explained.
Many legal technology startups are looking to design and sell technology similar to what Orrick Labs aims to build, but Ratcliffe explained that there are key reasons to develop and tailor that technology in-house. “The biggest reason is integration with existing systems. Right now, if you look at most law firms, the sites or services they have for these collaborations are islands unto themselves,” he explained.
Ratcliffe noted that practice group leaders are eager to contribute ideas and feedback to Orrick Labs' technology. “The tone and interest and excitement is very high. It's really a firm project, and culturally Orrick is committed to it,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250