More Tech, More Problems: The Downsides to Millennial Attorneys Working Remotely
As more millennials take the reins in the legal profession, working remotely is on the rise. But with technological advancements, some note lawyers' mental well-being may suffer.
February 20, 2019 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Most millennial attorneys are adopting technology that allows them to work remotely. But some observers caution that the easy accessibility of tech could lead to burnout and mental illness among current and future lawyers.
Working remotely is on the rise in the legal industry as law firms take cues from their clients in offering flexible work arrangements. Millennial attorneys entering the workforce represent a significant pivot in how law firms and departments allow lawyers to use technology.
“Millennials came of age without cellphones but came up professionally with cellphones,” said Shannon Murphy, a managing director of MLA Global who consults with Am Law firms. She also noted that Generation Z, who were born after 1996 and aren't quite in the legal profession yet, but are filling law schools, show no sign in slowing down in working remotely. “They don't know another way and are very comfortable connecting digitally.”
Law firms have responded to the growing request to work remotely by switching to cloud-based architectures to allow their attorneys access to encrypted and secure virtual environments, said AbacusNext's chief solutions architect Tomas Suros, who consults law firms on their software.
But such technology is expanding work hours, as lawyers can easily continue their work from anywhere digitally.
“I think there's an awareness that is growing, that the ability to be connected is [so] great, we no longer have to wait by the phone. … At the same time, it can increase the burnout, because you are always available,” said Nicole Leet, an Atlanta-based Gray, Rust, St. Amand, Moffett & Brieske partner and president of the State Bar of Georgia's Young Lawyers Division.
She added, “I think the conversation will shift to stopping the potential burnout.”
Lauren Stiller Rikleen, a lawyer consultant and author of “You Raised Us—Now Work With Us: Millennials, Career Success, and Building Strong Workplace Teams,” noted there is evidence of increased anxiety and depression in young adults. Society, and the legal industry, haven't addressed that working remotely isn't freeing up employees' time, she said.
“We aren't physically wired to not shut down. We don't talk about that; we don't pay attention to that enough,” Rikleen said. “We are starting to see increased data about that. We should be sounding the alarm around this issue.”
While all lawyers face potential burnout from constantly working, those that work remotely may have increased anxiety, Rikleen added.
“I would say the worry comes from the signals they receive,” she explained. “I'm talking with younger lawyers that are working remotely from work … and they get mixed signals from the office about how that will be viewed in the law office.”
She continued, “The message that they get is if you want to be seen as a committed lawyer, you need to be here all the time,” which can be a disconnect from the law firm's or department's written policy.
Christian George, an Akerman office managing partner and president of the Florida Bar's Young Lawyers Division, noted lawyers also face a pressure from clients to be on call.
“There's a pressure that we all feel to be flexible because we feel if we aren't, the client will find someone more flexible,” George said.
For incoming Generation Z, the struggle for work-life balance against the tide of technology and client demands will likely only intensify.
“[The data] suggests that the post-millennial generation will have the same experience as the millennial generation and more so,” Rikleen said. The pressures seem to be more intense, she added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250