Litigator of the Week: Playing the Long Game for Victims of Terrorism
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan partner James Bernard led a fight to recover more than $1 billion in assets for creditors who obtained favorable rulings from U.S. courts for losses suffered in Iran-backed attacks
July 06, 2017 at 07:34 PM
14 minute read
Last week, federal prosecutors won what is considered to be largest civil forfeiture in history against companies with ties to the Iranian government. But the real winners in the case may end up being the victims of Iran-sponsored terror plots who have won judgments against the country.
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan partner James Bernard led a team representing a group of judgment creditors that Southern District of New York Judge Katherine Forrest said last week are entitled to more than $1 billion in assets from two entities that are controlled by the Iranian government.
“We are very pleased to have brought our clients one step closer to obtaining the recovery to which they are entitled,” Bernard said. “This is a landmark ruling.”
The team from Stroock also included counsel Curtis Mechling; associates Patrick Petrocelli and Pamela Takefman; and former associates Nate Stopper, Ben Weathers-Lowin, Monica Hanna, Jeremy Rosof and Judy Goodwin.
Stroock represented four of 11 groups of creditors who have obtained favorable rulings from district courts around the country for losses suffered in Iran-backed attacks including the 1983 bombing of a Marines barracks in Beirut, the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia and numerous attacks in Israel.
In addition to ensuring that the various groups of judgment creditors were organized and on the same page in terms of new developments in the case, the Stroock team also had to fend off a formidable defense from attorneys from Debevoise & Plimpton and Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler.
“Addressing the various arguments was, candidly, also very challenging,” Bernard said.
Forrest found that the creditors are entitled to attachment and turnover of properties held by the Alavi Foundation, a charity formed by the last shah of Iran. Following the 1979 revolution that resulted in the overthrow of the shah, Alavi came under control of Iran's new theocratic government.
The centerpiece of Alavi's property holdings is the 36-story building at 650 Fifth Ave. in Manhattan, which was built in the 1970s and is valued at more than $500 million. Construction was financed by a $42 million loan from Bank Melli, which is owned and controlled by the Iranian government.
In 1995, the U.S. enacted tough sanctions against Iran that included an embargo on all trade and investment with the country. The government began seeking forfeiture of 650 Fifth in 2008. Alavi's other holdings include the Razi School in Woodside, Queens, as well as properties in Houston; Carmichael, California; Catharpin, Virginia; and Rockville, Maryland.
In two orders handed down in 2013 and 2014 granting summary judgment for the government and the creditors, Forrest said that Alavi and the Assa Corp., a partner entity with an ownership stake in the building, were fronts for Bank Melli, and thus fronts for the Iranian government.
Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Forrest as to Alavi, saying the record was not as clear on Alavi's ties to the Iranian government.
The case went back to Forrest, and a bench trial for the judgment creditors was held simultaneously with the jury trial for the government's civil forfeiture bid. The combined trials lasted about five weeks.
While the government was charged with proving that money was laundered on Iran's behalf, the judgment creditors had to show that the entities were agents or “alter egos” of Iran.
Finding for both the government and the creditors on June 29, Forrest called Alavi a “useful concealment device” for the Iranian government.
Typically the spoils collected by the government would be routed to a general government fund, but Bernard and his team managed to work out an agreement under which any recovered assets are given directly to the creditors.
While the Stroock team and their clients can chalk up a win, it doesn't appear that the battle will be over any time soon. Alavi still has some fight left in it and, even if the creditors win on appeal, they would still need to await the sale of the properties to collect on their judgments.
John Gleeson, a partner at Debevoise & Plimpton, said on Thursday that his clients plan to file notices of appeal after judgments in the case have been entered.
“We will just take what comes next one step at a time,” Bernard said.
Last week, federal prosecutors won what is considered to be largest civil forfeiture in history against companies with ties to the Iranian government. But the real winners in the case may end up being the victims of Iran-sponsored terror plots who have won judgments against the country.
“We are very pleased to have brought our clients one step closer to obtaining the recovery to which they are entitled,” Bernard said. “This is a landmark ruling.”
The team from Stroock also included counsel Curtis Mechling; associates Patrick Petrocelli and Pamela Takefman; and former associates Nate Stopper, Ben Weathers-Lowin, Monica Hanna, Jeremy Rosof and Judy Goodwin.
Stroock represented four of 11 groups of creditors who have obtained favorable rulings from district courts around the country for losses suffered in Iran-backed attacks including the 1983 bombing of a Marines barracks in Beirut, the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia and numerous attacks in Israel.
In addition to ensuring that the various groups of judgment creditors were organized and on the same page in terms of new developments in the case, the Stroock team also had to fend off a formidable defense from attorneys from
“Addressing the various arguments was, candidly, also very challenging,” Bernard said.
Forrest found that the creditors are entitled to attachment and turnover of properties held by the Alavi Foundation, a charity formed by the last shah of Iran. Following the 1979 revolution that resulted in the overthrow of the shah, Alavi came under control of Iran's new theocratic government.
The centerpiece of Alavi's property holdings is the 36-story building at 650 Fifth Ave. in Manhattan, which was built in the 1970s and is valued at more than $500 million. Construction was financed by a $42 million loan from Bank Melli, which is owned and controlled by the Iranian government.
In 1995, the U.S. enacted tough sanctions against Iran that included an embargo on all trade and investment with the country. The government began seeking forfeiture of 650 Fifth in 2008. Alavi's other holdings include the Razi School in Woodside, Queens, as well as properties in Houston; Carmichael, California; Catharpin,
In two orders handed down in 2013 and 2014 granting summary judgment for the government and the creditors, Forrest said that Alavi and the Assa Corp., a partner entity with an ownership stake in the building, were fronts for Bank Melli, and thus fronts for the Iranian government.
Last year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Forrest as to Alavi, saying the record was not as clear on Alavi's ties to the Iranian government.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250