Shout-Out: Skadden Scores for Viacom Directors Who Kept Paying Ailing Redstone Millions
Viacom directors who greenlighted $13 million in compensation to the company's nonagenarian chairman Sumner Redstone dodged a shareholder suit, thanks to a team from Skadden.
October 26, 2017 at 08:34 PM
14 minute read
Viacom directors who greenlighted $13 million in compensation to the company's nonagenarian chairman Sumner Redstone dodged a shareholder suit on Wednesday, thanks to a team from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.
Chancellor Andre Bouchard of the Court of Chancery in Delaware dismissed the suit, ruling the claims were released as part of a settlement agreement Viacom entered in August 2016.
The plaintiffs alleged that Viacom's directors knew Redstone, who is currently 94, was incapacitated and incapable of doing his job, but kept paying him anyway.
Viacom was represented by Stuart Baskin of Sherman & Sterling and Jon Abramczyk of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell.
Bouchard in his decision noted that Redstone was hospitalized several times in 2014 for pneumonia, and that his ability to speak and swallow was allegedly compromised. His paycheck for the year? $12 million.
In 2015, Redstone did not participate in any conference calls with analysts or attend any Viacom board meetings or the annual stockholder meeting, but was still paid $2 million.
In February of 2016, he was designated Chairman Emeritus and was paid $1.3 million until May of that year, when his salary was stopped without public explanation.
A complex and ugly fight ensued over removal of trustees over the trust that will eventually control Redstone's $40 billion empire, a move to amend Viacom's by-laws to permit vacancies on its board to be filled by Viacom's stockholders, and allegations that Redstone's daughter Shari exercised undue influence over him.
The cases settled in 2016.
The plaintiffs in the current case asserted claims derivatively on behalf of Viacom—breach of fiduciary duty and waste of corporate assets, and that Redstone was unjustly enriched.
But Bouchard found that the settlement agreement in the prior litigation shielded the directors.
“The plain language of the Release in the Settlement Agreement … unambiguously provides that Viacom released each of the individual defendants 'from any and all Claims' it had 'by reason of any matter, cause or thin'” arising up to the 'Effective Date' of the Settlement Agreement, which is defined to be August 18, 2016,” he wrote.
“[T]he Court has no basis upon which to ignore the terms of a presumptively valid release of claims and thus must dismiss the complaint,” the judge concluded.
The Skadden team included partners Edward B. Micheletti, Jay Kasner and Peter Atkins and associate Bonnie David,
Viacom directors who greenlighted $13 million in compensation to the company's nonagenarian chairman Sumner Redstone dodged a shareholder suit on Wednesday, thanks to a team from
Chancellor Andre Bouchard of the Court of Chancery in Delaware dismissed the suit, ruling the claims were released as part of a settlement agreement Viacom entered in August 2016.
The plaintiffs alleged that Viacom's directors knew Redstone, who is currently 94, was incapacitated and incapable of doing his job, but kept paying him anyway.
Viacom was represented by Stuart Baskin of
Bouchard in his decision noted that Redstone was hospitalized several times in 2014 for pneumonia, and that his ability to speak and swallow was allegedly compromised. His paycheck for the year? $12 million.
In 2015, Redstone did not participate in any conference calls with analysts or attend any Viacom board meetings or the annual stockholder meeting, but was still paid $2 million.
In February of 2016, he was designated Chairman Emeritus and was paid $1.3 million until May of that year, when his salary was stopped without public explanation.
A complex and ugly fight ensued over removal of trustees over the trust that will eventually control Redstone's $40 billion empire, a move to amend Viacom's by-laws to permit vacancies on its board to be filled by Viacom's stockholders, and allegations that Redstone's daughter Shari exercised undue influence over him.
The cases settled in 2016.
The plaintiffs in the current case asserted claims derivatively on behalf of Viacom—breach of fiduciary duty and waste of corporate assets, and that Redstone was unjustly enriched.
But Bouchard found that the settlement agreement in the prior litigation shielded the directors.
“The plain language of the Release in the Settlement Agreement … unambiguously provides that Viacom released each of the individual defendants 'from any and all Claims' it had 'by reason of any matter, cause or thin'” arising up to the 'Effective Date' of the Settlement Agreement, which is defined to be August 18, 2016,” he wrote.
“[T]he Court has no basis upon which to ignore the terms of a presumptively valid release of claims and thus must dismiss the complaint,” the judge concluded.
The Skadden team included partners Edward B. Micheletti, Jay Kasner and Peter Atkins and associate Bonnie David,
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250