Shout-Out: Willkie Farr Puts the Brakes on $10B Suit Against Soros
A team from Willkie Farr & Gallagher led by litigation partners Joseph Baio, Elizabeth Bower and Benjamin McCallen succeeded in pausing a $10 billion suit against George Soros and the Open Society Foundation.
December 01, 2017 at 01:43 PM
2 minute read
A team from Willkie Farr & Gallagher led by litigation partners Joseph Baio, Elizabeth Bower and Benjamin McCallen succeeded in pausing a $10 billion suit against George Soros and the Open Society Foundation.
On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge John F. Keenan of the Southern District of New York stayed the suit pending the resolution of a foreign arbitration.
The plaintiffs, represented by Louis Solomon and Michael Lazaroff of Greenberg Traurig, sued Soros in June on behalf of Guinea-based BSG Resources.
The 67-page complaint pulls no punches.
“Soros is a racketeer billionaire who acts in utter disregard of the rule of law and the rights of others,” Solomon wrote.
The plaintiffs claim Soros “used his enormous financial clout and influence through his network of organizations to delay, damage, and destroy an investment worth at least $5 billion that plaintiffs lawfully held to mine some of the world's most valuable deposits of iron ore located in the Simandou mountain range in the African nation of Guinea.”
And they accuse him of “fraud, illegality, defamation, bribery, and criminal misconduct.”
The dispute centers on what happened after Guinea's 2010 presidential election, when the candidate Soros supported won. Afterwards, Soros and the new president, Alpha Condé, held a joint press conference where they announced that all existing mining contracts in Guinea would be “re-examined” and a new mining code would be enacted.
Ultimately, the plaintiffs' mining rights were revoked. To date, Guinea has not compensated them for their $800 million investment.
But BSG Resources has already challenged Guinea's conduct before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes in an arbitration proceeding currently pending in Paris.
That was enough for Keenan to stay the case.
“Defendants have established that the same key issues underlie Plaintiffs' allegations in the Arbitration and the claims in this action,” he ruled. “Judicial economy weighs in favor of a stay to allow for resolution of these underlying issues and to avoid inconsistent results.”
The Willkie team also included associates James Fitzmaurice, Elizabeth Dunn, Gabrielle Antonello and Marcus Haggard.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250