Shout-Out: Covington Client Tessera Claims IP Victory
With a win at the International Trade Commission as ammunition, Covington & Burling client Tessera Technologies Inc. on Monday reached a global…
December 21, 2017 at 03:21 PM
2 minute read
With a win at the International Trade Commission as ammunition, Covington & Burling client Tessera Technologies Inc. on Monday reached a global settlement in a wide-ranging patent fight with Broadcom Corp..
The terms of the deal aren't public, but Covington's clients sound awfully pleased.
“This agreement validates the strength and breadth of our semiconductor portfolio, and provides us with a clear path to unlock the value of our innovations with other companies in the semiconductor industry,” said Jon Kirchner, CEO of Tessera parent company Xperi Corp.
In other words, watch out.
Tessera sued Broadcom and some of its customers at the ITC in May 2016, claiming its technology for fabricating modern semiconductor chips was being infringed.
Tessera also sued Broadcom as well as Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. and other Broadcom subsidiaries in federal court in Delaware. In return, Broadcom, represented by Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton with David Sipiora as lead counsel, sued Tessera in Los Angeles federal court.
In addition, there were proceedings in Germany and the Netherlands, and more than a dozen petitions for inter partes review filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
On June 30, 2017, after a week-long hearing, ITC Administrative Law Judge Sandra (Dee) Lord found a key Tessera patent was both valid and broadly infringed by more than 2,100 Broadcom products in seven different technology nodes extending across all of Broadcom's significant product lines.
The Covington litigation team included Robert Haslam, Sturgis Sobin, Michael Plimack, Nitin Subhedar, Christopher Eppich, Laura Muschamp, Dale Rice, Thomas Garten, Daniel Valencia and Matthew Phelps.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Clear the Runway': Bill Lee's Longtime Focus on Succession Planning
Cooley Litigation Rainmaker Mike Rhodes Set To Retire: 'It's a Good Time to Hang It Up and Do Something Else'
After Battling Cancer, Boies Schiller Rainmaker Stuart Singer Tackles Something New: Day-to-Day Firm Management
Trending Stories
- 1Wilson Sonsini Knocks Out Claims Against Inhibrx Biosciences in Trade Secrets Verdict
- 2Pass Rate on California's July 2024 Bar Exam Ticks Up to 53.8%
- 3TEST TEST
- 4High Court Asked To Review DOJ's 'Illusory Promise,' Religious Charter School, Meta Class Action
- 5'Rampant Piracy': US Record Labels File Copyright Suit Against French Distributor Believe
- 6$5.5M Miami Verdict: Meet the Lawyers Behind the Slip-and-Fall Suit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250