Daily Dicta: Clarence Thomas Tells All (To his Wife); Zach Fardon's Big Plans; FCA Report Card
Ginni Thomas scores an "exclusive interview" with her husband; Zachary Fardon is making his mark on King & Spalding's new Chicago office; A look at FCA stats for 2017.
January 09, 2018 at 02:26 PM
9 minute read
It's not what you'd call hard-hitting journalism, but Ginni Thomas this weekend did an “exclusive interview” with her husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, for the Dally Caller.
Once you get past the cringe-y stuff—“Clarence Thomas, you're the best man walking the face of the earth,” is how she begins—the 14-minute interview is quite interesting.
The justice offers a conciliatory message about civility and common ground, both sorely lacking in Washington these days.
“You have to figure out a way to work with someone else,” he said. “No matter who it is, what station in life, you can find something that you have in common, even if it's just a football team, an experience, it could be a hobby…It could be bigger things, like religion or philosophy. But you can find something.”
He credits divine providence for his path and asserts that ambition has “never played any role in my life.”
“You're always looking for the next calling, the next vocation, and so to live up to that vocation and calling, you have to discard these distractions of praise, of being afraid of being criticized, of wanting to be first, of wanting to be treated well and feted,” he said. “None of that has anything to do with being called to do what you're called to do. I'm called to do a job.”
However, there was one troubling mention: he used “motorhoming” as a verb. As in “We have been motorhoming now for 18 years.” (Noooo!)
Still, it's kind of awesome that the justice and his wife go tooling around the country in their old RV—and Thomas said he agreed with a man who told him years ago that “The best people in the country are in the RV parks….I think all of that informs what I do and the way that I look at things.”
|In Chicago, Zach Fardon Is Making His Mark at King & Spalding
It's been four months since former U.S. Attorney Zachary Fardon launched King & Spalding's Chicago office from a temporary, shoebox-sized Regus space with some supplies he picked up from the Walgreens across the street.
The top prosecutor in Chicago from 2013 until March of 2017, Fardon surprised the legal world by declining to return to Latham & Watkins, where he had been a partner, in favor of building King & Spalding's newest outpost.
Ensconced these days in much plusher digs, Fardon has been busy staffing the office with former top prosecutors.
The latest addition: Patrick Otlewski, who joined the firm on Monday from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois, where he tried 12 cases and won them all. Among them: the largest fraud case by dollar amount in the district's history.
He and Fardon go way back. When Otlewski was a new Latham associate, fresh off a clerkship with Judge Richard Wesley of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, he worked with Fardon in representing a lead witness in the prosecution of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich.
They overlapped again at the U.S. Attorney's office, where Otlewski spent seven years and rose to deputy chief of general crime.
“He's smart as a whip, he's got great judgment, and he's a good person,” Fardon said in an interview. “And he's a monster trial lawyer.”
Otlewski is the seventh lawyer to join King & Spalding's Chicago office, and Fardon says “a couple more” are expected by the end of the month. Previous hires include Patrick Collins, another former AUSA in Chicago who went on to become a partner at Perkins Coie in Chicago before joining his old friend at King & Spalding in October.
Fardon said he has been “moved and at times overwhelmed by the positive reaction across Chicago to our practice…There has been a tremendous amount of interest in the prospect of joining the endeavor we've started. I didn't take that for granted. It's exciting and flattering.”
At the same time, he remains “cautious of reaching for too much, too fast… There is a right way and a wrong way to grow.”
Fardon said he sometimes gets asked about how big a book of business it would take for a lateral to be considered. While portable business is certainly “nice,” Fardon said that's “not how we're approaching the process. We want talent and a cultural fit.”
To date, the Chicago office has been focused on litigation as well as King & Spalding's marquee special matters and government investigations practice, but Fardon said the long-term plan is to diversify into other areas including health care, life sciences, corporate and M & A work.
“I respect the fact that Chicago is a difficult legal market to waltz into,” Fardon said. Nonetheless his long-term goal is “to be the best law firm in town…lawyer over lawyer, to be second to none.”
|FCA Enforcement Stayed Strong in 2017
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher on Monday released a report analyzing False Claims Act cases in 2017, and found that while enforcement dipped slightly in the first year of the Trump administration, it's still at near-record levels.
“2017 marked the eighth straight year in which the federal government has recovered more than $3 billion in FCA cases and in which more than 700 new FCA cases were filed,” the firm found. “And despite hints from isolated elements of the Trump Administration that there may be some interest in reigning in perceived overreach with the FCA, top DOJ officials have reaffirmed their dedication to stringent enforcement of the statute.”
Read the full report here.
|
So About the 25th Amendment…
Politico's Josh Gerstein has an interesting story looking at the 25th amendment, and concludes it is unlikely to be invoked to remove Donald Trump from office for mental health reasons.
The amendment was passed after the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and the half-dozen experts Gerstein spoke with agreed it was more suited to a situation where the president was left physically incapacitated.
Former Reagan White House lawyer Peter Wallison told Gerstein that Trump's tweets or behavior to staff members are not grounds to remove him.
“The fact he acts strangely is not sufficient to invoke the 25th Amendment,” he said.
|More Legal News
Rimini Liable for Copyright Infringement Against Oracle but Not Computer Crimes, 9th Circuit Rules
The upshot is that the decision knocked $20 million off the award. The panel also advised the lower court judge to reconsider the $28.5 million attorney fee award and injunction.
The group will be led by former U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin and former New York State Attorney General Robert Abrams.
“Jane Doe 43″ has formally identified herself as Sarah Ransome in the case, which claims billionaire Jeffrey Epstein forced her to have sex for money.
Lead trial counsel in the latest AndroGel suit (this one involves blood clots, not heart attacks) will be Ronald Johnson of Schachter, Hendy & Johnson.
The ruling significantly raises the stakes of the litigation, which currently involves more than 6,000 pending cases in Philadelphia.
“We encourage any jurors who observed or heard of any potential misconduct or had concerns regarding the process to come forward,” said Reed Brodsky of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher.
Flordia's lawyer, Latham & Watkins partner Gregory Garre, seemed to have the edge over Kirkland & Ellis partner Craig Primis, who represented Georgia.
Claims against GEO Group Inc. included male officers asking female officers for sex, calling women explicit names and managers making sexually explicit comments to female officers.
Zuckerman Spaeder lawyers wrote that Judge Trevor McFadden's impartiality could be questioned because of his work for President Donald Trump's transition team, his time as second in command at DOJ's Criminal Division and his representation of clients in private practice at Baker & McKenzie.
“Milberg Tadler Phillips Grossman will have the resources necessary to take on the largest corporations and institutions on behalf of consumers, investors, institutional clients, and those that have long been under-represented to achieve justice.”
Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, wrote a 13-page dissent, reasoning that Tharpe is going to die anyway. (Yes, but aren't we all?)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShould It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
A Hearing Grappling With Tom Girardi's Memory Sends the Lit Daily Looking to the Past
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Nominates Ex-SEC Chief Jay Clayton to Helm Southern District of New York US Attorney's Office
- 2Steward Health CEO Saga Signals Escalation of Coercive Congressional Oversight Against Private Parties
- 3'They Should Have Tried to Negotiate': Jury Finds Against Insurer
- 4Expert Testimony Regarding Sexual Grooming
- 5Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250