Daily Dicta: 24,000 Years of Litigation?
The feds paid $534 million in 2017 for suits by power plants over storage of spent nuclear fuel--and there's no end in sight. Plus three airlines settle an antitrust class action.
January 11, 2018 at 12:08 PM
7 minute read
Some of the biggest litigation payouts in 2017 didn't even cause a ripple. $105 million here, $44 million there—32 payments totaling $534 million, secured almost entirely by a few lawyers from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius; Greenberg Traurig and Jenner & Block.
Because there isn't much glory in these settlements.
The payments are part of years-long hemorrhage by the federal government, which is stuck defending unwinnable breach of contract suits brought by power plants over the storage of spent nuclear fuel.
This year's bill of $534 million is actually on the low side. Last year, such legal settlements cost taxpayers $823 million. The year before, it was $650 million. Since 2011, the running tab totals $5.85 billion, according to an analysis by the Lit Daily of payments in the Treasury Department's Judgment Fund database.
The same lawyers dominate the docket: Alex Tomaszczuk from Pillsbury; Brad Fagg from Morgan Lewis; Jerry Stouck from Greenberg Traurig and Norman Hirsch from Jenner & Block.
And unless the Trump administration figures out how to cut a deal, there's no end in sight to the government's liability. Not when it'll be 24,000 years before the high-level waste decays.
As one lawmaker from Connecticut, where the Millstone Power Station is storing 31 massive canisters of spent fuel, put it, “The status quo is unacceptable.”
The suits stem from a deal struck by the feds and power plant owners under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Starting in 1983, the plant owners paid the Department of Energy an annual fee, and in return, the government promised to build a secure facility to permanently store their nuclear waste starting Jan. 31, 1998.
The power plant owners paid their fees, but the government has failed to build a facility. Breach of contract suits don't get much more straightforward than this. Indeed, the only real fights now are over the amount of the checks. (In many instances, the 2017 payments represent a yearly installment on prior settlements.)
In 2010, the Obama administration nixed a proposed depository in Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The move was widely viewed as a favor to then-Senate majority leader Harry Reid.
But the Trump administration has signaled it might revive the site.
According to the Las Vegas Review Journal, Office of Management and Budget director Mick Mulvaney in November acknowledged that he added $120 million to the federal budget to restart the Yucca Mountain licensing process.
“We have to put this stuff someplace,” he said of the waste. “So the $120 million you saw, it was actually very minor. I'm surprised it got that much attention as it did. It's only to explore the possibility of licensing.”
One problem: The project is wildly unpopular with citizens of Nevada—and Republican Senator Dean Heller, considered one of the GOP's most vulnerable, is up for reelection in 2018.
Still, our president fancies himself a dealmaker. If his administration can figure out a way to solve this problem, he'll do us all a great service. Because no one wants to litigate for 24,000 years.
And Then There Were Two
Three international airlines on Wednesday agreed to pay a combined $29.4 million to settle an antitrust class action, narrowing the field of remaining defendants in the yet-to-be-certified class.
The lion's share of the settlement—$19.5 million in cash plus $250,000 toward the cost of notice—will be paid by China Airlines, represented by Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman.
Philippine Airlines, represented by Covington & Burling, will pay $9 million, and Air New Zealand, represented by Condon and Forsyth, will pay a mere $650,000.
The plaintiffs alleged that the airlines conspired “to fix or stabilize prices for air passenger travel, including associated surcharges, for international flights involving at least one flight segment between the United States and Asia/Oceania.” Hausfeld and Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy are co-lead counsel.
In 2015, eight airlines settled for a combined $40 million.
Assuming U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of the Northern District of California approves Wednesday's deal, that will leave All Nippon Airways Co. and EVA Airways Corp. left in the case.
All Nippon is represented by Constantine Cannon's Ankur Kapoor, Alysia Solow, Douglas E. Rosenthal and Gary J. Malone, according to the court docket.
The EVA team from Kirkland & Ellis includes Tammy Tsoumas, Jonathan Faria, Heather Canner and James Mutchnik.
Both China Airlines and Philippine Airlines agreed in the settlement to “cooperate with plaintiffs by providing information related to the existence, scope, and implementation of the conspiracy.”
Buckle up—this could get bumpy.
More Legal News
The Chicago-based law firm allegedly failed to tell the insurer about a $3.25 million settlement offer. Instead, the company was hit by a $34 million jury verdict. Ouch.
Finjan Patent Trial Derailed After Federal Circuit Blows Up Damages Theory
The Federal Circuit ruling overall looks like a win for Blue Coat and appellate counsel Durie Tangri.
Gillibrand Promises to Block Berman's US Attorney Nomination
That Berman interviewed for the job with Trump was “deeply disturbing considering the conflicts of interest inherent by his potential jurisdiction on matters that could affect the president personally.”
Appellate Court Scolds Manatt for Strategic Delay in Anti-SLAPP Appeal
Manatt and its client sought “to extend SLAPP where it has never gone before.”
Merged Firm Faces $214M Malpractice Suit Over Kaye Scholer Work
The malpractice suit accuses Kaye Scholer of missteps prior to its union with Arnold & Porter.
Sotomayor Confronts DOJ's Noel Francisco About Switched-Up Position in Ohio Voter Case
“Seems quite unusual that your office would change its position so dramatically.”
Phila. Trial Judge Throws Out $28M Verdict in Xarelto Case
The judge granted the defense's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, wiping out the first win for the plaintiffs.
Judge to Name Carl Levin a Mediator in Flint Water Cases
No doubt his experience as a U.S. Senator taught him all about finding common ground with adversaries and working together for a solution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShould It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
Trending Stories
- 1Hasbro Faces Shareholder Ire Over 'Excessive' Toy, Game Inventory
- 2Paul Hastings’ New Partner Talks Giving Control to Agentic AI, EU AI Act Impacts, and More
- 3Judge Pauses Deadline for Federal Workers to Accept Trump Resignation Offer
- 4DeepSeek Isn’t Yet Impacting Legal Tech Development. But That Could Soon Change.
- 5'Landmark' New York Commission Set to Study Overburdened, Under-Resourced Family Courts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250