Litigator of the Week: Keeping the Dream Alive
Covington & Burling's Jeffrey Davidson took the lead at oral argument for plaintiffs challenging the Trump Administration's decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program--and won big.
January 12, 2018 at 02:00 PM
4 minute read
Covington & Burling litigator Jeffrey Davidson is no stranger to high stakes in the insurance coverage, antitrust and products liability cases he typically handles.
But with the fate of 700,000 so-called “dreamers” hanging in the balance, it's safe to say Davidson has never faced stakes like these. Working pro bono, he and co-counsel from firms including Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher are challenging the Trump administration's decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.
On Tuesday night, a federal judge in San Francisco gave Davidson and his clients, the Regents of the University of California and U.C. President Janet Napolitano, a milestone victory.
U.S. District Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California temporarily blocked a move by Trump's Department of Homeland Security that would end the DACA program, which shields children of undocumented immigrants from deportation. In a 49-page opinion, Alsup granted the plaintiffs' bid to halt the scheduled March 5 DACA rollback. The judge found that the decision to end the Obama-era program was based on a faulty conclusion that the prior administration exceeded its statutory and constitutional authority when implementing it.
In a phone conversation the day after the decision was handed down Davidson said the stakes were “tremendously high.” He called the people affected by the decision “wonderful Americans” and said working on the case has been a “really special” professional experience in keeping with Covington's long standing tradition of pro bono work and public service.
Napolitano, who was one of the architects of the DACA program during her time heading DHS, reached out to Covington because of her ties to partners with whom she served in the Obama Administration. Davidson said that two dozen lawyers at the firm—a team spread across Covington's D.C., San Francisco, and Silicon Valley offices—have worked on the DACA case so far. He leaned on his partners for administrative law expertise, including D.C.-based Mark Lynch.
“This is a D.C. law firm that's been around for a long time, so administrative law is in the wheelhouse in our ordinary practice,” Davidson said.
Covington was far from alone in representing individual dreamers, employers, states, unions, and other groups challenging the administration's DACA decision in the five consolidated cases before Alsup. Eric Brown of Altshuler Berzon, Ethan Dettmer of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, and Mark Rosenbaum of Public Counsel also argued on behalf of plaintiffs at a December hearing, and the plaintiffs have additional counsel from the California Attorney General's Office and Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy.
A spokesman for the Justice Department said after the decision that it was “an unlawful circumvention of Congress” and that the department “looks forward to vindicating its position in further litigation.”
Davidson said that the entire team representing the plaintiffs is committed to litigating the case to finality, if necessary.
“We still need to get to final judgment and we still need to get the complete administrative record from the government and there are still constitutional claims to be litigated,” Davidson said. But he added that he and his he and his co-counsel would welcome a legislative solution—“something to give [dreamers] some permanence and a path to permanent residence.”
Said Davidson, “I think that's what we all hope happens. We're in this to protect these people and we will keep going as long as we have to.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
A Hearing Grappling With Tom Girardi's Memory Sends the Lit Daily Looking to the Past
The High Art of Keeping Big Law Worker Bees Pleased (Or at Least Pleased Enough Not to Leave)
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250