Daily Dicta: After Morgan Lewis Exit, Can Former Fox New Host Andrea Tantaros Survive Pro Se?
David and Goliath is one thing, but this? It's David versus three Goliaths plus a battalion of Big Law lawyers. Also, Baker Botts scores the best kind of win for Cobalt International Energy.
January 31, 2018 at 01:14 PM
7 minute read
Well that didn't last long.
A mere two months after entering a notice of appearance, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius is out as counsel to former Fox News host Andrea Tantaros in her sexual harassment and illegal electronic surveillance suit against the television network and social media pioneer Peter Snyder.
Still, that's practically long-term compared to the tenure of her other lawyer, Tor Ekeland, whose New York-based firm specializes in complex computer and technology cases. He signed on to represent Tantaros on Jan. 16, but will file a notice of withdrawal on Jan. 31, he said in an email. He declined to say why.
As first reported by The Hollywood Reporter, Tantaros, who co-hosted the show “Outnumbered,” is now proceeding pro se in the fight.
The reason, she wrote in a letter to U.S. District Judge George Daniels in Manhattan on Jan. 29, is “for the simple fact that some stories can only be properly articulated and accurately explained by the ones who have walked in the shoes that have led them down a particularly challenging road. At times, even the finest lawyers in America cannot contextualize exactly what this company has done to so many people, and exactly what has transpired behind the curtain at Fox News.”
Morgan Lewis partner Christopher Parlo did not respond to a request for comment, but in a letter to the judge on Jan. 29, he made one thing clear: “Our firm is not the author of and is not counsel on the proposed Amended Complaint or its attachments. We will, however, assist Ms. Tantaros in her transition to pro se status.”
You get the sense Parlo didn't much enjoy his work on the case, which I previously called “a hornet's nest.” He picked it up after Judd Burstein, who runs a five-lawyer litigation boutique, withdrew in September due to “an irretrievable breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.”
Soon after Parlo was retained, the Morgan Lewis partner wrote to the judge that “Respectfully, in my nearly 30 years of practice I have never seen a group of lawyers so quick to threaten sanctions against other members of the bar or who would try to use our response to such threats to seek an advantage with this court in other pending motions (and all without giving the court the full background and context).”
So who are these sanctions-happy lawyers? Two of the best-known, most-respected litigators in the country, Dechert's Andrew Levander (named a Litigator of the Year by The American Lawyer in December of 2017) for Fox, and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher litigation practice co-chair Randy Mastro for Snyder and his company Disrupter Inc.
But this isn't a typical case. Reading the court filings, it's apparent that the defendants are apoplectic—way more than usual—about Tantaros's allegations.
Not so much the sexual harassment part (I mean c'mon, she worked for Fox under Roger Ailes). No. it's the illegal surveillance and hacking allegations, which also give Tantaros an opening to duck her employment arbitration clause and bring her case in federal court.
But she's got a point that Fox parent News Corp. has crossed lines like these before. Remember the UK phone hacking scandal, where News of the World journalists hacked the phone of celebrities, royalty and murder victims? Or this NPR story, detailing allegations of computer hacking by News America Marketing against competitors including Floorgraphics?
Tantaros wrote, “[T]he Defendants' have resorted to their standard modus operandi of incessant intimidation and hysteria by imposing, threatening and attempting to frighten every lawyer who seeks to illuminate the truth of the illegal behavior which has occurred at Fox News … by seeking the highly atypical, draconian legal tactic of seeking Rule 11 sanctions.”
It sounds pretty convincing. Except Tantaros is not a lawyer—she majored in French and journalism—and now she's representing herself against Levander and Mastro, as well as Thompson & Knight's Marion Bachrach.
David and Goliath is one thing, but this? It's David versus three Goliaths plus a battalion of Big Law lawyers.
Baker Botts, Take a Bow
Forget “Not guilty.” The best wins are the cases that never get brought.
Alas, they often entail scant glory for the lawyers.
So in that spirit, I salute Baker Botts partners Michael Goldberg and Russell Lewis for convincing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to close its investigation into the Angolan operations of client Cobalt International Energy without taking action.
The SEC began its investigation in March of 2017. According to the Financial Times, the agency was looking into Cobalt's deal with BP to jointly fund a $350 million research center to be run by Angola's state oil company which, after five years of payments, still hadn't materialized.
So yes, it's not terribly difficult to see why this might catch a regulator's attention. (Ahem, FCPA anyone?) Nor was it Cobalt's first time under scrutiny. The company was previously investigated by the SEC and the Department of Justice in 2011. The SEC closed that case in 2015 and the DOJ in 2017, both without taking action.
Now, Cobalt is off the hook once again, thanks to Baker Botts—at least until next time.
What I'm Reading
Securities Class Actions Hit Record Levels in 2017, Studies Say
Cornerstone Research found that three law firms—The Rosen Law Firm and Pomerantz, both in New York, and Los Angeles-based Glancy Prongay & Murray—were driving the increase in filings.
Mulvaney's CFPB Turns Down Loan Company's Bid to Reshape Settlement
Hey whatd'ya know, the CFPB didn't just roll over.
Court of Appeal Reignites Age Discrimination Suit Against Tinder
Older users get charged twice as much. “Old” in the Tinder universe is 30, by the way.
'Extreme,' 'Vicious' Trump Statements Put DACA Decision on a Different Level, Judge Says
Gee, I wonder how U.S. District Judge Nicholas Garaufis is going to rule?
As Waymo v. Uber Trial Nears, Judge Highlights MoFo's Awkward Role
“If it comes up, I don't want you to say, 'Oh judge, you have to exclude that because we're trial counsel,'” U.S. District Judge William Alsup told MoFo's Arturo González, one of Uber's lead lawyers on the case.
Fort Lauderdale Lawyers Win Nearly $71 Million Verdict for Yacht Rape Victim
The award includes $60 million for future suffering after the 20-year-old female steward was raped by deckhand who had returned from a night of drinking.
Amazon Moves to Close Courthouse Door to Claims Over Defective Solar Eclipse Glasses
Or you could just not wear eclipse glasses and look directly at the sun, like certain presidents. #MAGA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShould It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250