Daily Dicta: Who Needs a Courtroom if You've Got a Podcast?
There's litigating in the court of public opinion—and then wow. There's this case.
February 28, 2018 at 03:48 PM
7 minute read
There's litigating in the court of public opinion—and then wow. There's this case.
Lanny Davis represents Versata Software Inc. in a knock-down, no-holds-barred PR assault/ IP suit against Ford Motor Co.
Davis—a former special counsel and spokesman for President Bill Clinton, partner at Patton Boggs; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe; and McDermott Will & Emery before co-founding Davis Goldberg & Galper and public relations shop Trident DMG—is pummeling Ford just about every way you can think of.
There's a web site: TruthAboutFord.com. Press releases (“Ford Loses Again!”). A Twitter feed—@TruthAboutFord (which has nine followers). Paid advertisements directed at Elena Ford (“Tell the Truth Elena.”) And most recently, Davis launched a podcast: To Catch a Thief: The Story of Ford Motor Company Stealing $1 Billion in Trade Secrets from Versata.
The third episode, entitled “The Corrosion of Morality at Ford Motor Company,” just came out.
I was struck by how Davis justified the podcast in a press release: “Since Versata is unable to file defamation lawsuits against Ford for the false statements made in Ford's legal papers, which have absolute immunity from defamation suits, Davis explained that the podcasts were the only remedy available to Versata to 'set the record straight … to tell the truth.'”
Hold on a sec—the podcasts are “the only remedy available”? What about the lawsuit pending in the Eastern District of Michigan, where Versata claims Ford infringed its software patents, stole its trade secrets and breached its contract? Surely that might also be a way to set the record straight, what with a judge and jury and federal rules of civil procedure?
Davis did not respond to a request for comment. Brooks Cushman partner John LeRoy, who represents Ford, also did not respond to a request for comment.
So what are these slanderous lies that demand rebutting? In the most recent podcast, Davis offered this as one example: “Ford filed multiple public claims with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that Versata's software was so obvious and unoriginal that it didn't deserve to be patented,” he said. “But then, the U.S. Patent Office denied every single Ford claim. Every single one. Yet Versata could not sue Ford for defamation because its lies were submitted in legal documents.”
Um. It was a PTAB challenge. Invoking a standard reason for invalidity. Not exactly grounds for meeting on the field of honor at dawn.
The case is pending before U.S. District Judge Matthew F. Leitman at the summary judgment stage.
|
Shout-Out: Sullivan & Cromwell and Norton Rose Wrap up Another Enron Suit
Just when you thought all the Enron-related cases were over—wait, here's one more!
On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed dismissal of a shareholder class action against UBS Financial Services.
It's a win for Sullivan & Cromwell's Robert J. Giuffra, Jr., Brendan P. Cullen and William H. Wagener, as well as for Norton Rose Fulbright's Rodney Acker, Ellen B. Sessions and Katherine D. Mackillo.
The plaintiffs—represented by Dawn Meade and Bonnie Spencer of the Spencer Law Firm in Houston—were PaineWebber customers who purchased Enron debt securities. They alleged UBS was complicit in structuring financial vehicles to enable Enron to mislead the public as to its fiscal performance.
The panel didn't buy it, tossing the case for failure to state a claim
Favorite quote: “UBS Plaintiffs' allegations—principally references to Defendants' vague corporate platitudes about their integration as a firm—may logically support that Defendants shared a community of interest in their business activities, but this alone is insufficient to support joint venture liability.”
Read the full decision here.
|
Lateral Watch
Latham & Watkins snagged Alston & Bird's ITC practice head Jamie Underwood—a move that underscores the benefits of being civil to opposing counsel.
“We see an awful lot of people on the other side of the table,” Bert Reiser, who leads Latham's ITC practice, told my colleague Scott Graham. “Often you think 'Is this someone I'd like to practice with?' With Jamie the answer was definitely yes.”
Read the full story here.
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius welcomed back Philip A. Miscimarra, who rejoins the firm's labor and employment practice from the National Labor Relations Board.
A partner at Morgan Lewis from 2005 until he was appointed to the NLRB in 2013, Miscimarra was elevated to chairman in 2017 by President Donald Trump. Fittingly, he'll lead Morgan Lewis' NLRB special appeals practice.
|
Oooh Don't Mess with the USDA
The USDA just released its first quarter enforcement report, which reveals the agency brought one criminal case, against John Lonczynski, president of Greenview Meats Inc. He pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania to selling about 2,500 pounds of ground beef that was adulterated and misbranded, according to Food Safety News. The meat allegedly contained beef hearts and excess fat.
He could have gotten a year in prison and a $100,000 fine.
The actual penalty? Probation and a $25 fine.
Lonczynski—who was represented by a public defender—apparently didn't have the money to pay more. But c'mon, $25? Somehow I don't think the meat industry is running scared.
|
What I'm Reading
Jeff Sessions on 2nd Circuit's LGBT Ruling: Judges Must Have 'Read the New York Times'
A less-than-respectful reaction to the court's en banc holding.
Microsoft's lawyer, E. Joshua Rosenkranz of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe told Ginsburg, “This is a very new phenomenon, this whole notion of cloud storage in another country. We didn't start doing it until 2010.”
“At bottom, TVEyes is unlawfully profiting off the work of others by commercially redistributing all of that work that a viewer wishes to use, without payment or license,” the panel said.
Give 'em hell Justice Breyer!
The new efforts include the creation of the Prescription Interdiction and Litigation, or PIL, task force. (How do you suppose it took to come up with that acronym?)
The court found Nike didn't infringe Jacobus Rentmeester's copyright to a photo of a picture he shot of Michael Jordan when he was still a student at the University of North Carolina.
You won't like him when he's angry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShould It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
Trending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250