Katyal Begins Defense of New Pa. Congressional Map in Redistricting Fight Before SCOTUS
Neal Katyal has joined Gov. Tom Wolf's efforts to defend Pennsylvania's recently re-drawn congressional districts before the U.S. Supreme Court.
March 05, 2018 at 05:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
A Big Law attorney known for battling President Donald Trump's proposed travel bans has joined Gov. Tom Wolf's efforts to defend Pennsylvania's recently re-drawn congressional districts before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal joined Wolf's legal team last week, and on Monday he filed a response to calls from several Pennsylvania Republican lawmakers to have the U.S. Supreme Court upend a congressional map that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court drew up last month after determining that the previous map was unconstitutionally gerrymandered.
Katyal was acting solicitor general in the administration of former President Barack Obama, and has recently been in the spotlight representing Hawaii in that state's efforts to block the Trump administration from suspending the entry of foreign nationals from several predominantly Muslim countries.
Katyal has agreed to represent the Wolf administration in the redistricting fight pro bono.
Wolf's brief to the U.S. Supreme Court was one of eight filed Monday in Turzai v. League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania. The filings come in response to a request by Republican legislators to have the U.S. Supreme Court stay the newly drawn congressional map while their efforts to have the map vacated work their way through the appellate courts.
In January, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that the state's congressional map drawn up in 2011 had been such a partisan gerrymander that it “clearly, plainly and palpably violate[d] the constitution.” Several weeks later, on a 4-3 vote, the court issued a new map to be used in the upcoming congressional race.
State legislators, led by Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives Michael Turzai and Senate President Pro Tempore Joseph Scarnati, quickly challenged the new map in federal court, and sought to block its use in the upcoming 2018 election cycle.
After the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania declined to grant the emergency stay, Turzai and Scarnati filed an application for stay with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who gave the parties until Monday to respond.
“The Pennsylvania Supreme Court conspicuously seized the redistricting process and prevented any meaningful ability for the legislature to enact a remedial map to ensure a court-drawn map,” the emergency application for stay said.
Jason Torchinsky of Holtzman Vogel Josefiak Torchinsky and Kathleen Gallagher of Cipriani & Werner filed the application Tuesday on behalf of Turzai and Scarnati.
In its response, filed Monday, the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania, which filed the successful state court challenge to the 2011 map, noted that the Republican legislators had previously asked Alito to stay the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's January decision to toss the 2011 map, and said, “Now it's deja vu all over again.”
“Applicants return to this court, again seeking a stay, raising arguments materially identical to the ones they presented barely a month ago. But their arguments have not improved with age,” said the response, filed by Mimi McKenzie of the Public Interest Law Center and Arnold & Porter's David Gersch. “Their ostensible hook for federal intervention remains an elections clause theory that this court has squarely rejected in decisions dating back nearly a century.”
Wolf, in his response, made similar arguments that the case raised state court issues and that Alito had already rejected similar efforts from Scarnati and Turzai.
“If anything, the current stay request is on weaker ground than the last because the commonwealth has now begun to implement the new map, tilting the equities even further against federal judicial intrusion,” Wolf said in the motion.
In an email, Katyal said, “I'm honored to have joined the team, and very much look forward to the federal courts' evaluation of the thorough and careful opinion of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Because the matter is now pending in multiple courts, I won't have further comment at this time.”
Torchinsky and Gallagher did not return a call for comment Monday afternoon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCase Over Fatal Phila. Food Truck Explosion Resolved in $160M Pretrial Accord
Seeger Weiss Awarded $51M in Fees for 'Landmark' NFL Concussion Settlement
Lancaster Jury Awards $4M Over Misdiagnosis of Infant's Fatal Whooping Cough
Justices Weigh Waiver in Wrongful Death Case Over Drowned Triathlete
Trending Stories
- 1Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 2E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 4FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
- 5Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250