Greenberg Traurig Wins $1.2 Million in Attorney Fees for Years of Litigation
Greenberg Traurig's Stephen Mendelsohn worked on one of the longest-running disputes in the Palm Beach Circuit Court.
March 12, 2018 at 03:41 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Palm Beach Circuit Judge Donald Hafele granted Greenberg Traurig more than $1.2 million in attorney fees and costs in a ruling that provides insight into billing rates at one of the nation's largest law firms.
Greenberg Traurig is the eighth-largest U.S. law firm based on attorney head count, according to the National Law Journal's 2017 NLJ 500 ranking. With about $1.39 billion in gross revenue in 2016, it ranked 14th on The American Lawyer's 2017 Am Law 200. On the 2016 Global100 survey, it was the world's 19th highest-grossing law firm.
The details in the Palm Beach Circuit Court ruling point to rates for high-priced attorneys who billed up to $785 per hour.
“The court has reviewed the record and agrees with the parties' counsel that their hours and attorneys' fees and costs are reasonable,” Hafele ruled March 7.
The final judgment resolved a dispute that Greenberg Traurig has shepherded since 2008 when the firm entered an ongoing fight on behalf of shopping center investors in an ownership dispute. It capped about 23 years of litigation in what Greenberg Traurig believes is the oldest continuous case in the Palm Beach Circuit Court.
The case dates back to 1995 with Becker & Poliakoff serving as plaintiffs counsel until 2008. It pitted plaintiffs Delray Property Investments Inc. and SOSQ Property Investments Inc. against Plaza La Mer Inc., South Square Development Inc. and Boca Raton businessman Harry Hahamovitch.
Their feud stemmed from the sale of two commercial properties — Plaza La Mer in Juno Beach and South Square in Brooksville. The one-time business associates had a profit-sharing agreement, but plaintiffs claimed Hahamovitch fraudulently received a $144,000 commission.
Before Greenberg Traurig entered the case, the jury agreed Hahamovitch had committed fraud. But the court then rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the finding wiped out the defendants' right to share in the venture's profits.
“The next question was how do you define their profit participation, and how do you calculate them?” said Greenberg Traurig shareholder Stephen Mendelsohn. “That took from 2008 until 2013 to determine.”
It took years for a court-appointed accountant to unravel the shopping centers' finances on a month-by-month basis. A sticking point was whether the investment had generated any gains from which the defense would benefit.
“It was still theoretical,” Mendelsohn said.
That question turned on a complicated formula the parties used to determine profits. The algorithm would keep a neutral party, CBIZ Inc. accountant Bradley N. McIver, occupied for about five years.
“I wouldn't say (the formula) was as complicated as the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, but it had similar principles,” Mendelsohn quipped.
In complex litigation that the Fourth District Court of Appeal once described as a marathon, the defense asserted a right to $10 million in cash flow on the Juno Beach property alone. But the trial court ruled in the plaintiff's favor, and the Fourth DCA affirmed.
BILLING RATES
Hafele this month returned a million-dollar award for the plaintiffs' litigation expenses following a Sept. 26, 2017, appellate ruling ordering the circuit court to enter final judgment and calculate expenses for litigation from 2008 to 2013.
The order shows Mendelsohn billed at $405, $460, $525, $575 and $625 per hour over the years. Shareholder Marc Sinensky billed at $645 and $685. Brigid Cech Samole's rate ranged from $400 to $535. Appellate shareholder Elliot Scherker had the highest rate of $785 per hour.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'They've All Got to Be Sweating Tacks': Attorneys Discuss Liability Over FIU Bridge Collapse
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250