$33M SEC Whistleblower Award Sets Agency Record
"These awards demonstrate that whistleblowers can provide the SEC with incredibly significant information that enables us to pursue and remedy serious violations that might otherwise go unnoticed," Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC's whistleblower office, said in a statement Monday.
March 19, 2018 at 12:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated at 1:54 p.m.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday awarded a whistleblower more than $33 million—the largest bounty issued in the seven-year history of the agency's program for rewarding tipsters—for tipping off authorities about misconduct at Merrill Lynch.
In addition to the $33 million award, which broke the previous high of $30 million issued in 2014 to a whistleblower in a foreign country, the SEC announced that two other tipsters would share a nearly $50 million award.
The three whistleblowers, represented by Labaton Sucharow LLP partner Jordan Thomas in New York, helped an SEC investigation into Bank of America Corp.'s Merrill Lynch brokerage that resulted in a $415 million settlement in 2016 and an admission that the firm's brokerage unit misused consumers' cash. The settlement resolved claims that Merrill Lynch violated the agency's Customer Protection Rule by keeping at its disposal billions of dollars that should have been deposited into a reserve account meant to protect customers in the event of the firm's failure.
Thomas, a former SEC attorney, said the three whistleblowers reported anonymously through him to the SEC. The agency's rules require whistleblowers reporting anonymously to retain counsel.
“The best protection against retaliation and blacklisting is the ability to report anonymously,” Thomas said in a brief phone interview Monday. “My clients have been fortunate to avoid such negative outcomes because of the SEC whistleblower program.”
“As a result,” he added, “my clients have been able to live a normal life and will be able to live a normal life—just with a lot more money.”
In a prepared statement, Thomas described his clients as “a shining example of integrity in action” and said they planned to donate “a substantial part of this life changing award” to charities. Thomas declined to detail the fees he earned representing the three whistleblowers.
The SEC's announcement did not specify which enforcement action the three whistleblowers aided. The agency has a policy against identifying whistleblowers.
With the three bounties approved Monday, the SEC has now awarded 53 whistleblowers since the program's start. The agency has approved more than $262 million in whistleblower bounties since issuing its first award, of $50,000, in 2012.
”These awards demonstrate that whistleblowers can provide the SEC with incredibly significant information that enables us to pursue and remedy serious violations that might otherwise go unnoticed,” said Jane Norberg, chief of the SEC's whistleblower office. ”We hope that these awards encourage others with specific, high-quality information regarding securities laws violations to step forward and report it to the SEC.”
The latest awards come at a challenging time for the SEC's whistleblower program, which was created as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reforms passed in 2010.
In February, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that whistleblowers must contact the SEC to benefit from Dodd-Frank's more robust protections against retaliation. The ruling dealt a blow to the SEC's broader interpretation of the statute. The agency and the U.S. Justice Department had taken the view that Dodd-Frank's whistleblower protections also extended to tipsters who only reported concerns internally to their employers.
Whistleblower lawyers have said the Supreme Court's ruling, in Digital Realty Trust v. Somers, could backfire against corporate America and drive employees who might otherwise report internally to contact the SEC with suspicions or evidence of misconduct.
For the SEC, the ruling raises the question of how vociferously the whistleblower office should continue to promote internal reporting as a first step for would-be tipsters. The SEC, which awards worthy whistleblowers with between 10 and 30 percent of money collected when sanctions from an enforcement action exceed $1 million, looks fondly on those who first raise concerns to their employers.
This report was updated with additional information about the SEC's awards.
The SEC's whistleblower order is posted below:
Read more:
'The SEC Has a Big Problem Now' After Broad Whistleblower Protections Curbed
The SEC's Whistleblower Program in 'Full Stride': By the Numbers
SEC's Whistleblower Chief Says Companies Heed Call Not to Silence Tipsters
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Continues Finance Practice Build
- 2Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
- 3'We Neither Like Nor Dislike the Fifth Circuit'
- 4Local Boutique Expands Significantly, Hiring Litigator Who Won $63M Verdict Against City of Miami Commissioner
- 5Senior Associates' Billing Rates See The Biggest Jump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250