Ex-Perkins Coie Partner Sues His Firm, Again
Perkins Coie rejected claims that it discriminated against a former partner in Los Angeles because of his Christian beliefs and his disabilities.
March 20, 2018 at 07:11 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Nicholas Rockefeller, a former partner at Perkins Coie in Los Angeles, has sued his former firm for allegedly discriminating against him because of his disabilities and his religion.
Rockefeller practiced as a “Christian fundamentalist” when he was at the firm, and other lawyers referred to it as a “kook religion,” he alleges in a March 14 complaint filed in Los Angeles federal district court. Lawyers at the firm also perceived him as being HIV positive, based on his disabilities, he alleges.
“This suit by a former partner who has not been with Perkins Coie since 2005 is baseless and subject to arbitration, just as a federal court ruled in 2010 in the previous lawsuit he filed. We will defend this matter vigorously since it is utterly without merit,” Terence Gordon, a spokesman for the firm, said in an emailed statement.
Jeremy Osher of Boren, Osher & Luftman in El Segundo, California, who represents Rockefeller, did not respond to requests for comment.
Rockefeller asserts that the firm hired him in 2000, offered him a partnership in 2003 and then granted him a medical leave of absence based on his disabilities in 2004.
During that same year, however, the firm lowered his compensation because of his disabilities, he alleges. Before his leave, he had earned $550,000 in annual compensation, he claims, but the firm proposed lowering his compensation by more than $100,000 after he took the medical leave. The firm attempted to force him to resign by threatening to sue him and then terminated him while he was still on medical leave in December 2005, the complaint says.
Rockefeller also alleges that the firm refused to repay him costs he incurred as a result of a lawsuit filed by a former corporate client, In4Network, which named the firm and Rockefeller as defendants.
In February 2007, a Washington state appeals court dismissed a lawsuit Rockefeller brought against Seth Landau, then the chief executive of In4Network. The court also affirmed sanctions of $225,000 against Rockefeller for bringing a frivolous claim. The Washington Supreme Court denied a petition for review in April 2008.
Rockefeller's attorney in that litigation, Kenneth Sidle, did not respond to a request for comment. Sidle is a partner at Gipson Hoffman & Pancione in Los Angeles.
Rockefeller could not be reached for comment.
As the firm noted Tuesday, Rockefeller has also sued the firm previously. In a 2009 complaint, he sought declaratory relief from the court calling for the firm and its insurer to indemnify him against the potential liabilities arising from the Landau litigation. In the final order in that case, a federal judge ruled that Rockefeller is bound by an agreement to arbitrate his claims against Perkins Coie's insurer.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250