John Dowd Calls Mueller 'Terrific' After Passing Trump Baton
Dowd said representing the president was hard work, and now he wants to "just take it easy, and get some rest."
March 28, 2018 at 03:34 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
After 39 weeks and six days working for President Donald Trump, John Dowd figures he deserves a break.
“I think what I'm trying to do is just take it easy, and get some rest,” Dowd said after awaking from an afternoon nap on Tuesday, five days after quitting as the lead lawyer helping Trump navigate special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe.
“I'm not going to discuss why I resigned,” Dowd said. “It was very hard work. You had to pay attention every day.”
A former Marine Corps captain who retired from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld's partnership in 2015, Dowd joined the president's private legal team last June. By the time he left on March 22, he and Trump were reportedly clashing on strategy and on Trump's efforts to hire more attorneys.
(Dowd was back in the headlines again on Wednesday, after The New York Times cited anonymous sources to report that he had raised the idea of presidential pardons with lawyers for two of Mueller's targets, Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort. Dowd told the Times the report was untrue.)
Now that he is no longer obliged to serve his embattled Oval Office client, Dowd, who is in his 70s, said he plans to enjoy his family and simply relax. He noted he has “done a lot of pro bono” in the past, but said he would take some before deciding how much lawyering is in his future.
When it comes to his feelings for the president, Dowd said: “I really do wish him well. I'm in his corner.” But he also expressed admiration for Mueller—even as others on Trump's legal team have taken pains to criticize the special counsel's investigation.
“I have said before and I'll say again: We had a terrific relationship with Mueller—the best that I can recall in my 50 years of practice. It was terrific, completely open, people trusted each other, and we had no misunderstandings,” Dowd said.
While he led the president's team, Dowd said, he was always the one to speak to Mueller on the telephone. “I expect Jay is doing that now,” Dowd said, referring to Trump personal lawyer Jay Sekulow.
Sekulow regularly accompanied him when he had meetings with Mueller's team, Dowd said.
As for the apparent turmoil on Trump's legal team leading up to and in the wake of his departure, Dowd demurred.
“I have exited the stage,” he said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLessons From Top Plaintiffs Lawyers' Pursuits Outside the Courtroom
Georgia Plaintiffs Lawyer Who Took on GM Says Jury Trials 'Must Resume ASAP'
4 minute readIn Senate Race Sideshow, Georgia's Loeffler Attacks Opponent for Criminal Defense Practice
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250