Drinker Biddle Accused of Health Care Deal Breakup Over Alleged Disclosures Tied to Miami Indictment
The lawsuit questions what an ex-federal prosecutor told a client about a "person of interest" in a $1 billion Medicare fraud case.
April 06, 2018 at 04:44 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
Drinker Biddle has been hit with a complaint accusing one of its partners of improperly briefing a client on details of a Miami health care fraud investigation that he learned about while serving as a federal prosecutor.
The lawsuit claims a joint venture to establish a drug rehab center fell apart after attorney Antonio Pozos linked one of the parties in the deal to a massive Medicaid fraud case.
Hackensack University Medical Center and Carrier Foundation signed a deal with Jonathan Lasko, a manager of drug detox centers, in June 2017 to establish a rehab facility in Mahwah, New Jersey, the complaint said. But HUMC and Carrier, a behavioral health care provider in Belle Mead, New Jersey, pulled out in February after Carrier's counsel at Drinker Biddle advised them that Lasko was a “person of interest” in the Medicaid fraud investigation. Lasko is suing and says the information against him is “false, inaccurate and/or misleading” and was not a sufficient basis to abandon the joint venture.
Lasko said the source of the information was Pozos, who joined Drinker Biddle's Philadelphia office in January after three years in the Justice Department's criminal fraud section. Lasko alleged libel, false-light defamation and tortious interference with prospective business relations against Pozos and Drinker Biddle. The suit also brings a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against HUMC and Carrier. The suit seeks $17 million in damages.
Lasko and his company, JNL Management, asserted Pozos should have kept information about the Medicaid probe to himself.
The suit said officials of HUMC told a lawyer for Lasko on Feb. 16 that they would not proceed with the joint venture because a Drinker Biddle lawyer told them Lasko was tied to the case against Philip Esformes. In July 2016, Esformes, who owns over 30 skilled nursing and assisted living centers in South Florida, was indicted in a $1 billion Medicare fraud scheme.
When Assistant Attorney General Caldwell announced the indictment, he said it was “the largest single criminal health care fraud case ever brought against individuals” by federal prosecutors.
Enformes is set for trial Oct. 1 before U.S. District Judge Robert N. Scola Jr.
Drinker Biddle told the HUMC officials the Justice Department “is not done with” Lasko, and Enformes has a financial interest in Lasko's JNL company, the suit claims. In addition, the HUMC officials told Lasko's lawyer that Drinker Biddle told them Lasko has a business relationship with a man known as “Mr. Delgado,” who is involved in the Esformes case, and Lasko is under investigation for possibly referring patients to Esformes' facilities.
Brothers Gabriel and Guillermo Delgado have reached Medicare fraud plea deals with the government and have cooperated with investigators against Enformes.
“Even, assuming arguendo, that the statements were true, they should not have been disclosed by Pozos as, at a minimum, Pozos committed a violation of his duty of confidentiality. There may be additional improprieties committed by Pozos, including, without limitation, violations of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, as well as state bar rules and federal regulations, but that is not for this matter,” Lasko's suit stated. There is no publicly available information about the allegations, Lasko said in the suit.
Carrier and HUMC face a count for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
JNL attorney Holly Schepisi said she was told the information about Lasko came from Drinker Biddle through a “recently hired partner who was formerly with the DOJ,” the complaint said.
If HUMC and Carrier went ahead with the drug rehab center, Lasko said his company would have received revenue of $29 million over the next 20 years, with profits of $16.4 million.
Pozos and Drinker Biddle would not comment on the case. Lasko's lawyer, Jeffrey Lichtstein of Cohen Tauber Spievack & Wagner in New York, also declined to comment.
Mary Jo Layton, a spokeswoman for HUMC parent Hackensack Meridian Health, declined to comment. Shannon Hurley, a spokeswoman for Carrier, also declined to comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1State Law Falls Short on Disability Rights
- 2People in the News—Nov. 26, 2024—Barley Snyder, McNees
- 3Akin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
- 4Walking a Minute in Your Adversary’s Shoes: Addressing the Issue of 'Naive Realism' at Mediation
- 5The Moving Goalposts of Overtime Exemption: Texas Judge Invalidates 2024 Salary Threshold Rule
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250