Daily Dicta: Geoffrey Berman Is Nobody's Lapdog
President Trump may have handpicked Geoffrey Berman to be U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, but the former Greenberg Traurig partner has upheld the independence and integrity of his office.
April 10, 2018 at 12:15 PM
9 minute read
Geoffrey Berman Is Nobody's Lapdog
I was wrong.
When reports emerged last year that President Donald Trump took the highly irregular step of personally interviewing Geoffrey Berman to be U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, I called the former Greenberg Traurig partner a “tainted nominee.”
“Because how do you escape the distinct sense that the chosen one will have been hand-picked, vetted to make sure he'll show appropriate loyalty and deference to his patron?” I wrote.
Geoffrey Berman, I apologize. In securing the search warrants for the FBI to raid Michael Cohen's office, you showed the independence and integrity that are hallmarks of our finest law enforcement officials.
Cohen's lawyer, Stephen Ryan of McDermott Will & Emery, blasted the raid.
“The decision by the US attorney's office in New York to conduct their investigation using search warrants is completely inappropriate and unnecessary,” Ryan said in a written statement. “It resulted in the unnecessary seizure of protected attorney-client communications between a lawyer and his clients.”
Maybe. But a magistrate judge also signed off on the warrant, finding probable cause.
Popehat blogger Ken White lays it out well. “Now, magistrate judges sometimes are a little too rubber-stampy for my taste,” White wrote. “But here, where the magistrate judge knew that this would become one of the most scrutinized search warrant applications ever, and because the nature of the warrant of an attorney's office is unusual, you can expect that the magistrate judge felt pretty confident that there was enough there.”
White also said a warrant to search an attorney's office would have required approval from Berman—it could not be the handiwork of a few rogue AUSAs.
According to The New York Times, which first reported the raid, investigators are looking into possible bank fraud as well as Cohen's payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.
President Trump promptly called the raid “a disgraceful situation.” And Berman may now find himself in the crosshairs of the Fox News/ Breitbart/ Alex Jones hate machine, along with Special Counsel Robert Mueller III and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. Or maybe he'll get fired.
But if he does, he can leave with his head held high. He has maintained the independence of his office when it would have been easier to protect the man who hired him. But that's not the job. U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, but they do not serve the president.
Thank you Geoffrey Berman for remembering that.
|
Lessons from Legally Blonde
Here's a shameless proud mama moment: My daughter has the lead in her high school's production of “Legally Blonde: The Musical.” As a result, I'm now thoroughly familiar with every line and note in the show, which includes immortal quips like “Law school is for people who are boring and ugly and serious.”
Much of the plot is ridiculous—sorry, but a super-selective, Big Law firm would not let law students play key roles in the defense of a (paying) client in a high-profile murder trial.
But there's one thing that “Legally Blonde” does intuitively grasp: The most effective litigators are not intellectual snobs who live in a bubble.
Consider how some of the Harvard Law students describe themselves in song.
Aaron Schultz: “I won a Fulbright and a Rhodes. I write financial software codes. … Some say that I'm a pompous creep. Somehow I don't lose that much sleep. Why bother with false modesty? Harvard's the perfect place for me.”
Sound like anyone you know?
Or take Enid Hoopes: “I did the Peace Corps overseas, inoculating refugees in family clinics that I built myself from mud and trees. I fought to clean up their lagoons and save their rare endangered loons, then led a protest march against insensitive cartoons.”
Elle Woods, the heroine, responds to Enid, “I love your top! It's so fatigue chic.” And goes on to offer that she's a Gemini with a double Capricorn moon and was Sig Ep Sweetheart. “Oh! And just last week at Fred Segal, I talked Beyonce out of buying a truly heinous cable-knit tube top. Whoever said tangerine is the new pink is seriously disturbed.”
[Stunned silence]
But of course Elle ultimately saves the day. She's the only one the client, exercise guru Brooke Wyndham, can relate to. (“Thank god someone on this legal team gets me!”) And Elle is also the only one to whom Brooke will reveal the truth.
Especially in the criminal context, getting a client to be honest can be an issue.
Scott Greenfield, of counsel at Hull McGuire and author of the criminal defense blog Simple Justice, writes of one client who told him, “I thought you would try harder if you thought I was innocent.” Other excuses he's heard include “I was embarrassed,” “I forgot,” and “I didn't think it mattered.”
“Some prefer to embellish their stories by emphasizing the things they think show their innocence,” he continued. “Some tell you all the things they believe the cops did wrong, or their legal analysis of the situation, omitting the details of their own conduct that don't serve their ends as well.”
But part of effective advocacy is cutting through all that clutter to nail down critical facts. And that's something Elle in Legally Blonde is able to do, where her colleagues with different (and more conventionally lawyer-ly) life experiences failed.
In its own way, Legally Blonde is a call for diversity. Not of race or ethnicity, but diversity of background in general.
Indeed, it is Elle's decidedly non-academic knowledge of hair care that's key to discrediting otherwise damning witness testimony in one of the best fictional cross-examinations ever.
“Water deactivates the perm's ammonium thiglycolate and completely ruins it,” Elle says as she confronts the daughter of the murdered tycoon on the stand. “It's the cardinal rule of perm maintenance. Your perm is still intact so you couldn't have showered that day. Why would you lie about being in the shower? Why would you lie about not hearing the gunshot?”
The daughter confesses, Brooke goes free, and Elle winds up as class valedictorian.
But there's a darker truth in Legally Blonde as well, one that for my daughter's sake I wish was as fanciful as the rest of the show.
The brilliant Harvard professor/ law firm managing partner Callahan—who announces, “I hire four new interns every year. From this class I will select four young sharks whom I respect, and those four will have a guaranteed career”—is a sexual predator.
He gets Elle alone, tells her she could be a great lawyer, and then tries to kiss her. When she slaps him, he says, “I thought you were smarter than that.”
Elle responds, “Is this the only reason you gave me an internship?”
Callahan answers, “It's been nice working with you, Ms. Woods. You can show yourself out.”
He's never held accountable, although the client fires him and has Elle successfully represent her at trial.
I'd like to think in real life, in the wake of the #MeToo movement, there would be consequences for the professor. But honestly, I don't know. There might just be a settlement and an NDA.
When I asked my daughter if she would report him, I was heartened by her response: “Of course,” she said. “He can't do that.”
|
What I'm Reading
Facebook's Response in Court Less Conciliatory Than Zuckerberg's Planned Congressional Testimony
While Mark Zuckerberg readies his apologies to Congress, Facebook lawyers from Gibson Dunn are nowhere near as contrite.
She took one step out the door and got bit on the toe by a water moccasin—which is awful, but c'mon, it's a wild animal and she lives in Florida.
A pair of Skadden partners dissect the ongoing trial and how the judge may be leaning.
Think traffic school for shoplifters, plus a dollop of extortion.
Stephen Reinhardt's last opinion is a standout.
Opinions from the grave are OK at the Ninth Circuit, but not at the Supreme Court.
Who us, what? We practically didn't even know the guy.
Do not have sex with your clients. Period.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllShould It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
7 minute readA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
Trending Stories
- 1Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 2These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 3'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 4Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 5Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250