Fox May Bring Sex Harassment Claims Against Ex-Exec Who Sued Over Religious Bias
Fox Broadcasting's breach-of-contract counterclaim may proceed against a former executive who has sued the network for religious discrimination, but who Fox says was fired for violating the company's sexual harassment policies.
April 11, 2018 at 06:13 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Fox Broadcasting's breach-of-contract counterclaim may proceed against a former executive who has sued the network for religious discrimination, but who Fox says was fired for violating the company's sexual harassment policies.
Cliff Pozner, who worked for Fox for 22 years, the last two as the company's executive vice president of pricing, planning and inventory management, was fired in September 2016 after numerous current and former employees came forward with sexual harassment allegations against him, Fox said according to an opinion from a Manhattan Supreme Court judge, and other papers filed in the case.
In April 2017, Pozner began litigation with a suit against Fox alleging both breach of contract and religious discrimination, claiming he was fired because he is Jewish. He claimed he is entitled to more than $9.3 million in compensatory and punitive damages.
But two months after Pozner filed his suit, Fox fired back with counterclaims of breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty.
Pozner's ouster came just months after Fox News founder Roger Ailes resigned amid sexual harassment allegations of his own and before the dismissals of other Fox personalities who have been accused of sexual misconduct, including TV hosts Bill O'Reilly and Eric Bolling.
The suit also detailed the allegations against Pozner that the company looked into, including accusations by two female colleagues that Pozner asked them to expose themselves and an accusation that Pozner suggested that a female colleague have sex with a supervisor so that the supervisor would be less demanding of their department.
Ruling on Fox's counterclaims in an order published this week, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla preserved the company's breach-of-contract counterclaim, finding that Pozner had agreed to follow Fox's anti-sexual harassment policies as a condition of his employment contract.
But Scarpulla rejected Fox's breach-of-fiduciary claim, finding that, as an executive and an employee, Pozner had a duty to be loyal to the company, that the loyalty extends to not committing acts that are at odds with the employer's business interests, such as embezzlement and usurping business opportunities.
“Fox has failed to present, and I haven't found any New York case, in which sexual harassment by an executive, without more, forms the basis for a breach of the duty of loyalty claim, resulting in the employer's recovery of the employee's salary for the entire term of such conduct,” the judge said.
Michael Goettig, of counsel to Davis Wright Tremaine, represents Fox. He declined to comment.
Ethan Leonard of the Law Offices of Neal Brickman represents Pozner. He did not respond to a message requesting comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 2Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 3Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 4Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 5Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250