LA Judge Rebuked for Media Interview, 'Flippant' Court Remark
Los Angeles County Judge John Lord was publicly admonished for talking to a reporter about a pending case and for publicly suggesting prosecutors gave preferential treatment to a white domestic violence victim.
April 11, 2018 at 06:26 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Commission on Judicial Performance admonishment of Judge John Lord.
California's judicial watchdog agency on Wednesday admonished a Los Angeles County judge for talking to a reporter about a pending case and for publicly suggesting prosecutors gave preferential treatment to a white domestic violence victim.
The Commission on Judicial Performance said Superior Court Judge John Lord is guilty “at a minimum” of improper action for speaking with the Grunion Gazette, a Long Beach news outlet, about why he did not issue a protective order in a 2015 domestic violence case.
A jury in Lord's courtroom found defendant Melvin Roberts guilty of misdemeanor domestic violence in February 2015. Roberts asked for a new trial. Before the hearing on the request took place, Lord told the Gazette in an interview that he didn't issue a protective order for the victim in the case because he wanted “everything to remain the status quo.”
Lord's comments were printed in a March 26, 2015, Gazette article in which a victim's advocate said the judge at the end of the trial appeared to advise the defendant's attorney to seek a new trial.
Judicial canons bar judges from talking about pending cases.
“Judge Lord's comments, at a minimum, created the impression that he was defending his statements and rulings in Roberts and may have also created the appearance that he was embroiled in the Roberts case,” the commission wrote.
When Roberts returned to Lord's courtroom in April for his retrial motion, the judge accused prosecutors of treating Roberts' wife better than another woman, “Ms. Sarres,” who had also sought a protective order.
“Ms. Sarres has as her perpetrator a convicted felon, long history of violence, Ms. Sarres gets almost no protection from the City Prosecutor's Office whereas Mrs. Roberts, who's as white as a piece of Wonder Bread, gets all kinds of protection and attention from the prosecution office,” Lord said, according to a partial court transcript included in the commission's decision.
Lord's “flippant remark about the victim in the Roberts case being 'as white as a piece of Wonder Bread' was inconsistent with canon 3B(4), which requires judges to be patient, dignified and courteous to those with whom they deal in an official capacity, and may have furthered the appearance that the judge was embroiled in the Roberts case,” commissioners wrote.
Neither Lord, nor his attorney, Edith Matthai of Robie & Matthai, could be reached for comment Wednesday afternoon.
The commission said it took into account Lord's past discipline in deciding to issue a public admonishment. In 2016 he was privately admonished for becoming embroiled with a criminal defense attorney, including improperly starting a contempt proceeding against the lawyer.
In 2011 he received an advisory letter for accusing a pro per criminal defendant of “misrepresenting facts” and engaging in “gamesmanship.”
The CJP's admonishment is posted below:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Rudy Giuliani's Attorneys Seek Withdrawal in Debt Enforcement Case
- 2SEC, South Florida Developer Rishi Kapoor Reach Settlement
- 3Senate Democrats Advance 4th Circuit Pick Ryan Park’s Nomination
- 4Judge Rejects Meta’s Plea to Send FTC Antitrust Suit to Trash Heap
- 5How Have You Fared in 2024? Share Your Insights in the Managing Partners Survey
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250