Suit Alleges Houston Woman Seduced, Defrauded Prominent Texas Lawyer Walter Umphrey
The lawsuit, filed in Harris County, seeks more than $2 million from the Houston woman and her lawyer.
April 13, 2018 at 07:18 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Walter Umphrey.
The wife of well-known Beaumont, Texas, plaintiffs lawyer Walter Umphrey filed a lawsuit on Friday alleging a Houston woman seduced Umphrey and induced him to transfer money and property worth more than $2 million to her without the wife's knowledge, consent or authorization.
Umphrey is a prominent Texas plaintiffs lawyer who obtained billions of dollars in verdicts and settlements in asbestos litigation. He is also well-known for helping negotiate a historic $17.3 billion settlement with tobacco companies on behalf of the state of Texas.
The suit, filed in the 11th District Court in Harris County, alleges Jolyne Thompson “engages in behavior designed to target, seduce, and then defraud, wealthy men” and that Umphrey was “one such target.” Plaintiff S.G. Umphrey, who is Umphrey's wife Sheila, and the Umphrey Family Limited Partnership, also a party in the suit, allege that Thompson knew Walter Umphrey was married.
Harold “Hap” May, a Houston lawyer at Harold “Hap” May PC in Houston, and JMT Homestead Irrevocable Trust are also named defendants in the suit. May did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the allegations. Thompson, who is listed in the lawsuit as a trustee of JMT, could not be reached.
The plaintiffs in Umphrey Family Limited Partnership. v. Thompson are represented by Zona Jones, a partner at Harrison Davis Steakley Morrison Jones of Beaumont. Jones, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment, is a former partner at the Provost Umphrey Law Firm. Umphrey is identified on the firm's website as nonactive since 2016. He is also listed on the State Bar of Texas website as retired.
The partnership and S.G. Umphrey allege that Thompson was introduced to Umphrey sometime around 2008 and “she initiated and participated in an affair with Mr. Umphrey.” They allege that beginning in 2008 and for many years, Thompson “induced Mr. Umphrey to transfer significant property, assets, and monies belonging to plaintiffs to and for the benefit of the defendant Thompson as part and parcel of their affair.”
The plaintiffs allege that in September 2008, Umphrey transferred $24,000 to Thompson to enter a World Series of Poker event in Las Vegas and she quickly became accustomed to such events and extravagant gifts. “As time passed, Thompson's grip on Mr. Umphrey's wallet tightened,” the petition filed by the plaintiffs says.
in thier suit, the plaintiffs also allege that in 2012 Umphrey “began experiencing early-onset Alzheimer's” and Thompson proceeded to take further advantage of him “with full knowledge of Mr. Umphrey's diminishing mental faculties.”
According to the petition, Thompson “induced” Umphrey to transfer $175,000 to her in July 2012; to wire $1.5 million in October 2012 from the family partnership to JMT for purchase of a property in Houston; and to issue checks for $30,218, $42,143 and $52,952 between 2013 and 2015 for property taxes for the property.
The plaintiffs allege Thompson and May acted “in concert” to conspire, defraud, injure and damage the plaintiffs by obtaining and receiving money and assets the defendants knew were the property of Umphrey and the partnership, and with the knowledge that Sheila Umphrey had not joined in that transfer.
“The full extent, nature, and amount of money and assets swindled by the defendant Thompson without authorization, knowledge, or consent of plaintiffs is presently unknown to plaintiffs,” the plaintiffs allege,
The plaintiffs allege May had knowledge of the “fraudulent scheme” and his involvement, experience and expertise as a CPA and real estate attorney “were a substantial factor in defrauding plaintiffs.”
They are seeking more than $2 million and an accounting of the money and property. They are also seeking title for the Houston property, reformation of the deed, and a declaratory judgment that the partnership should hold title to the property.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHelping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
Why Litigation Demand Might Break Firms’ Boom-and-Bust Cycle
Trending Stories
- 1Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 2Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
- 3Ex-Schnader Partner Nears Settlement in Misappropriated Comp Class Action
- 4The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
- 5Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250