Trump's Attorney Cohen Drops Defamation Suits Over Steele Dossier
Days after appearing in federal court over material seized in a federal raid, Cohen's attorney confirmed he's dropping suits in state and federal court against Buzzfeed, which published the dossier, and the political research group that commissioned it, Fusion GPS.
April 19, 2018 at 05:59 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's personal lawyer, dropped state and federal defamation lawsuits against Buzzfeed and the political research firm Fusion GPS over the publication of a dossier compiled by a former British spy that claimed connections between Cohen and Russian government agents, his attorney confirmed Thursday.
“The decision to voluntarily discontinue these cases was a difficult one,” Gerstman Schwartz name attorney David Schwartz said in a statement. “We believe the Defendants defamed my client, and vindicating Mr. Cohen's rights was—and still remains—important. But given the events that have unfolded, and the time, attention, and resources needed to prosecute these matters, we have dismissed the matters, despite their merits.”
Cohen filed the state claims against Buzzfeed and federal claims against Fusion GPS in their respective courts in Manhattan after the news company published the information in the report by Christopher Steele, at the behest of Fusion GPS, shortly after Trump was elected. Cohen claimed he was defamed by claims in Steele's dossier that Cohen was in Prague meeting with a Russian connection in 2016.
Cohen has denied those claims, offering up his passport, absent any Czech stamps, at one point to reporters as evidence of the fact. A recent report by McClatchy, however, cast doubt on Cohen's claims, reporting that Special Counsel Robert Mueller has information that Cohen was, indeed, in the Eastern European city in late-summer 2016.
However, it is likely another development in Cohen's life that weighed more heavily.
Earlier this month, federal agents raided Cohen's homes and offices. Federal prosecutors said in court filings that a criminal investigation into Cohen has begun. Reports indicate Cohen is being looked at in a number of areas of interest, from his business ties to the taxi industry for tax violations, to the payments and hush agreements he helped arrange for Trump ahead of the 2016 election that violated campaign finance laws.
Cohen was in court earlier this week attempting to slow the government's review of the material seized in that raid over attorney-client privilege concerns. Those concerns ultimately resulted in revealing that Fox News host Sean Hannity was also communicating with Cohen, though Hannity downplayed the connection in public statements.
In a statement, Buzzfeed spokesman Matt Mittenthal said Cohen's suit, among a few filed against the company over the dossier's publication, has “never been about the merits of our decision to publish it.”
“If there's one thing Democrats and Republicans agree on today, it's that the dossier was an important part of the government's investigation into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia,” Mittenthal said. “Its interest to the public is, and always has been, obvious. Today's news suggests that Donald Trump's personal lawyer no longer thinks an attack on the free press is worth his time.”
A separate defamation suit against Buzzfeed is currently proceeding in Florida, where Russian tech executive Aleksej Gubarev sued over allegations in the dossier that he was connected to Russia's hacking of Democratic Party targets during the 2016 presidential election.
Additionally, a defamation suit filed on behalf of so-called Russian oligarchs against Buzzfeed over the same underlying material is proceeding in New York County Supreme Court.
In a statement issued by Fusion GPS, the company said it welcomed “but was not surprised” by Cohen's decision, “rather than face a discovery process that would have forced him to defend his reputation and address the allegations of the Steele dossier under penalty of perjury.”
“With his decision, it appears that Mr. Cohen can now focus on his many other legal travails,” the statement said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250