Wells Fargo Turned to Sullivan & Cromwell Ahead of $1B Consumer Settlement
“We always try to play absolutely straight with the regulators,” H. Rodgin Cohen, Sullivan & Cromwell's senior chairman and a lawyer for Wells Fargo, told The American Lawyer last year.
April 20, 2018 at 04:52 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Wells Fargo in San Francisco. Credit: Mike Scarcella/ ALM
Wells Fargo & Co. turned to Sullivan & Cromwell for the negotiations with financial regulators that ended in Friday's $1 billion agreement to resolve various mortgage and auto-lending abuses, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The settlement with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency comes two years after those agencies fined Wells Fargo for opening millions of potentially unauthorized accounts. The $100 million fine Wells Fargo agreed to pay to the CFPB in 2016 had represented the largest penalty in the agency's history.
H. Rodgin Cohen. Credit: Rick Kopstein/ ALMAmong the Sullivan & Cromwell lawyers representing Wells Fargo was one of Wall Street's most prominent lawyers: H. Rodgin Cohen, the firm's senior chairman and a go-to adviser for banks in trouble.
“You don't build trust in an hour or a day,” Cohen, honored for an The American Lawyer lifetime achievement award, said last year. “We always try to play absolutely straight with the regulators.”
Cohen was joined by Mitch Eitel, managing partner of Sullivan & Cromwell's financial services group, and Nicolas Bourtin, managing partner of the firm's criminal defense and investigations group, along with Stephen Meyer and Shari Leventhal, special counsels in the financial services group.
Wells Fargo senior deputy general counsel Heidi Mason and deputy general counsel Craig Baldauf were also actively involved in the settlement negotiations. A spokesperson for Wells Fargo declined to comment Friday about its legal representation.
Wells Fargo vowed to repay customers and improve its compliance practices as part of the settlement. The settlement marked the first enforcement action brought by the CFPB under its President Donald Trump-appointed interim director, White House budget director Mick Mulvaney.
At a congressional hearing earlier this month, Democrats questioned Mulvaney's commitment to the CFPB's enforcement role, noting the lack of any new cases and his past statements that the agency would no longer “push the envelope.” Mulvaney responded that the CFPB was investigating multiple matters and actively litigating 25 cases.
Announcing the Wells Fargo settlement on Friday, Mulvaney said he appreciated the OCC's role in the settlement negotiations. “As to the terms of the settlement: We have said all along that we will enforce the law. That is what we did here,” he said.
Sullivan & Cromwell is no stranger to Wells Fargo's regulatory scrutiny.
A Sullivan & Cromwell team is defending Wells Fargo in shareholder litigation over the sales practices at issue in the 2016 settlement. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein and Saxena White are co-lead counsel in consolidated actions against Wells Fargo, which are pending before U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco federal court.
Sullivan & Cromwell litigation partners Richard Klapper, Brendan Cullen and Christopher Viapiano are counsel for the bank, in addition to Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer partner Gilbert Serota in San Francisco. Klapper is a former managing partner of the litigation team, and Cullen coordinate the firm's appellate work.
Several firms are defending Wells Fargo in civil suits brought by cities over allegations of discriminatory mortgage lending practices. Those firms include Hogan Lovells, Duane Morris, K&L Gates, Munger, Tolles & Olson and Proskauer Rose.
The law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, along with Munger Tolles, represented Wells Fargo in the 2016 settlement talks with the CFPB and OCC.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250