McIver Defense Promises to Appeal Jury's Guilty Verdict for Murder
The jury also convicted McIver of aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and influencing a witness.
April 23, 2018 at 04:35 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Report
A Fulton County jury on Monday convicted Atlanta attorney Claud “Tex” McIver of felony murder for the 2016 shooting of his wife, Diane McIver.
The jury also convicted Tex McIver of aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and influencing a witness. The influencing a witness charge stemmed from what prosecutors argued were McIver's efforts to persuade Dani Jo Carter—who was driving the SUV when he shot his wife—not to talk with police about the shooting.
The jury of five men and seven women acquitted McIver of malice murder. Malice murder requires forethought as well as intent. Felony murder is a homicide that occurs during the commission of a felony—in this case aggravated assault.
The verdict came hours after Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Robert McBurney issued an Allen charge to the deadlocked jury in an attempt to push them toward a consensus.
District Attorney Paul Howard said McIver would be taken into custody immediately and sentenced at a later date. Felony murder carries a mandatory life sentence in Georgia.
At a news conference after court adjourned, Howard said, “Diane, we hope you are watching, and we hope you feel we stood for you.”
Billy Corey, chairman of U.S. Enterprises where Diane McIver was president, said the jurors “stood up for Diane today,” adding, “May Diane rest in peace.”
Executive Assistant District Attorney Clint Rucker, who led the prosecution, said he spoke to jurors after they convicted Tex McIver.
“They had a real plan about how they went about their deliberations,” he said. He said that although they appeared deadlocked, “They expressed to me they were happy about the fact the judge asked them to go back and finish their work.”
“They were very, very confident in their verdict,” Rucker said. The legal issue of intent “provided some challenges for them,” he added. “It took them a while to kind of dissect the language of the charge.”
Rucker also said he believes the jurors' decision to revisit the McIvers' Ford Expedition, and sit where McIver had sat while holding the revolver he fired “proved pivotal.”
McIver's sister, Dixie Martin, who was at her brother's trial every day, had no comment. Annie Anderson, the massage therapist who testified for the defense to say she had been unfairly maligned by prosecutorial innuendo to suggest she had a romantic or a sexual relationship with McIver, began sobbing and left the courtroom in tears.
Defense attorney Bruce Harvey said following the verdict, “There is no question” that McIver will appeal the conviction. “I do think it is a travesty in that it is the triumph of emotion over reason. It is a sad day for the rule of reason … I don't believe for a minute that Tex McIver deliberately shot his wife in the fashion that they say occurred, and I will never believe that, no matter what the speculation, innuendo, or other unproven emotional matters, and frankly, aberrant behavior [that took place] after the event occurred.”
He also questioned the practice of allowing jurors to pose questions to witnesses after the lawyers finished their examinations. Although the Supreme Court of Georgia has approved the practice, Harvey said that in a criminal trial, “I think it changes that Sixth Amendment dynamic. … It remains an issue, and will be an issue, I'm confident.”
In convicting McIver of murder, the jury rejected arguments put forth by his defense that Diane McIver's shooting on Sept. 25, 2016, was an accident rooted in a chronic sleep disorder that caused him to unintentionally fire his Smith & Wesson .38-caliber revolver while sitting in the rear seat of the couple's SUV.
They also rejected an alternative charge of felony involuntary manslaughter resulting from reckless conduct—a lesser offense McBurney added to the list of charges the jury could consider.
Tex McIver fired the gun as the couple was being driven home by Carter. The bullet pierced the front seat where Diane McIver was sitting. The McIvers were traveling on a midtown Atlanta thoroughfare at about 10 p.m. and had just stopped at a traffic light across from Piedmont Park when the gun fired.
The original jury was evenly split between men and women, but one male juror left the case during the trial's first week because of a family medical emergency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Davis Polk and Legal Aid Society Team to Knock 15 Years Off Sex-Trafficking Survivor's Sentence
Litigators of the Week: Feds Drop Charges Against Maryland Lawyer Facing Fraud Case Over $12M in Somali Funds
Talking Shop About Tom Girardi's Criminal Trial With My Colleague Amanda Bronstad
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250