Latham Poaches IP Litigator Tara Elliott From Wilmer
She brings experience and connections from the busy District of Delaware and the Federal Circuit.
May 01, 2018 at 06:43 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Tara Elliott. |
For the second time in two months, Latham & Watkins has added an accomplished IP trial attorney to its D.C. ranks.
Tara Elliott joined Latham from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr on Tuesday. Though only 42, she is a veteran of Delaware district court litigation, having once clerked for U.S. District Judge Gregory Sleet of the District of Delaware and having served on the district's magistrate judge merit selection panel.
“I've been there long enough to remember when Delaware had the highest volume of patent litigation, before Texas,” Elliott said Tuesday. “Now we're seeing the pendulum swing back, but Delaware has always been an important venue for patent litigation.”
➤➤ Get IP practice news straight to your in-box with Skilled in the Art from Law.com. Learn more and sign up here.
Since the Supreme Court's TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods decision last year, Delaware has eclipsed the Eastern District of Texas as the No. 1 spot for patent filings.
“She has a lot of experience in the District of Delaware, and we love that,” Latham IP co-chair David Callahan said, noting that the firm doesn't have an office there. But the bigger attraction was Elliott's track record as a litigator and the way she connected personally with partners across the firm.
According to a search of RPX Corp.'s database, Elliott's clients have included Dell, Microsoft Corp., Walmart Inc. and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations.
Elliott studied computer engineering as an undergraduate and worked for the CIA before attending law school. Her job was to write and orally present intelligence analysis.
“Given the gravity of the work we were analyzing and the way our work was going to be used to inform and as a basis for policy decisions, it was critical that it was technically accurate, well written, clear, credible, precise and concise,” she said. “These are the very skills I use daily as a litigator.”
The difference is now she does it as an advocate, she added.
After graduating from the University of Pennsylvania Law School, she worked for 11 years at Fish & Richardson before joining Wilmer in 2014. She also did a one-year clerkship with Federal Circuit Judge Raymond Clevenger III during the mid-2000s, and currently sits on the Federal Circuit Advisory Council.
Latham's IP group has been active the last eight months, hiring Kevin Wheeler from Fish & Richardson in October, then Jamie Underwood from Alston & Bird in February and now Elliott.
Recruiter Linda Ginsberg, who helped broker the Elliott hire and has assisted on others, said Latham has built its IP practice almost from scratch with 24 hires over the last 10 years. With some of those hires now in their 50s, the firm is actively recruiting the next generation of IP partners.
“A lot of firms will not invest the time in getting to know the next generation,” she said. “They only speak with the folks who have already been recognized as leaders for decades.”
Ginsberg and Callahan emphasized that Latham doesn't operate on a star system, where the practice revolves around a couple of key players. Instead the firm has assembled more than a dozen first-chair trial lawyers in its IP group.
“I'm thrilled to be joining Latham's nationally integrated IP litigation practice, which has steadily grown in stature in recent years and built its reputation as one of the top IP firms in the market,” Elliott said. “I look forward to being a part of this incredibly talented team that is helping clients navigate their most complex intellectual property disputes.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250