The Women Warriors Behind Gilead's Huge Federal Circuit Win
Fish & Richardson partner Juanita Brooks, a titan of the IP bar, has been practicing for 40 years. This is the first time she's had a case where both her courtroom team and the in-house lawyers have all been women.
May 02, 2018 at 11:23 AM
4 minute read
There was a moment before a recent high-stakes argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit began when the lawyers for Gilead Sciences Inc. were huddled together and realized something.
The outside counsel—Fish & Richardson partners Juanita Brooks, Deanna Reichel and Betsy Flanagan—and the in-house Gilead lawyers—Lorie Ann Morgan, vice president, intellectual property, and Andrea Hutchison, associate general counsel IP litigation—were all women.
And here's something telling: Brooks, a titan of the IP bar and The American Lawyer's 2014 Litigator of the Year, never had that happen in 40 years of practice.
“It was fabulous,” she said, describing the team dynamic as “unbeatable.”
Sure enough, the Federal Circuit on April 25 sided with Gilead in a fight with Merck & Co. over hepatitis C drug patents. In a precedential decision, the panel upheld the lower court's decision to wipe out a $200 million infringement verdict against Gilead because Merck's litigation and business misconduct constituted unclean hands.
It was a hard-fought win, with oral arguments that lasted two hours, and included a series of tough questions for Brooks from Judge Richard Taranto. (She credits Reichel and Flanagan for her preparation.) He went on to write the unanimous opinion, which Brooks called “very carefully, thoughtfully crafted,” and all but “bulletproof” against en banc or Supreme Court reversal.
Of course, if the Gilead team had been all men, no one would have batted an eye. “I hope there comes a time where it's not noteworthy to have an IP litigation team run by women,” said Gilead's Morgan. “Given the number of women in the legal profession, it should be closer to equal. … But we're making some progress.”
In-house counsel like Morgan and Hutchison are helping to make it happen. “It troubles us when we see a team come in and it's four middle-aged white guys—and one junior associate to bring diversity, whether it's ethnic or gender,” Morgan said. “We don't hire people just because they are women or ethnic minorities. … But you need diversity of thought, and for that, you need diversity of background.”
Hutchison added that they recognize there is “a limited number of senior people” who fit the bill, but that they do expect more diverse junior lawyers “to be given a serious role, not to be window dressing.”
Brooks is well-acquainted with that tactic. “So many times I'll enter my notice of appearance, and then the other side will enter a notice of appearance of a woman” too, she said. “They'll sit them at the counsel's table like a potted plant.”
She added, “We certainly don't have token women. We're the real deal.”
Laughing, she calls herself a triple threat—a woman, a Hispanic, and a member of the firm's management committee.
Brooks joined Fish & Richardson in 2000, and her star power has helped Fish attract the next generation of women IP litigators like Flanagan and Reichel in an especially male-dominated practice area.
“We have a real mentor and role model and inspiration,” Reichel said of Brooks.
Morgan of Gilead sings her praises as well.
“Juanita and I have worked on many, many cases,” she said. “I remember the first time I saw her in court. It was a Markman hearing in an ANDA case, and she was just awesome. I was blown away.”
Still, the full Gilead team outside the courtroom wasn't exclusively female. For example, Fish principals Craig Countryman, Jonathan Singer and Robert Oakes also worked on the briefs.
Flanagan stressed the “important role that our male colleagues play. They also encourage us to do good work and mentor us.”
Brooks added, “One reason we have been able to end up with an all-women team is because many of the men we are fortunate enough to work with are gender-blind. They don't pay attention to gender or the color of skin. It's simply the merits. It just happens organically. Hopefully, in a few years from now, this won't be news.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Trade Secret Win at the ITC for Viking Over Promising Potential Liver Drug
Litigation Leaders: Mark Jones of Nelson Mullins on Helping Clients Assemble ‘Dream Teams’
Litigators of the Week: Ingersoll Rand Enforces a Noncompete Against an Exec Who Jumped Ship to Verboten Competitor
Litigator of the Week: After Years Repping Prenatal Testing Client, First-Time First Chair Lands a $57M Patent Damages Verdict
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250