$3M Age-Bias Settlement Compensates Restaurant's Unsuccessful Job Applicants
Courts of appeals are split on whether companies can be held liable for discriminating against older job seekers based on age. Seasons 52, represented by Seyfarth and Akerman, did not admit wrongdoing in the EEOC settlement.
May 03, 2018 at 05:22 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
The national restaurant chain Seasons 52 has agreed to pay $2.85 million to resolve claims it unfairly discriminated against job applicants over the age of 40, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said Thursday.
The EEOC's settlement with 35 Seasons 52 restaurants requires the company to implement additional mandatory training for employees and managers, hire an external and internal compliance monitor to track progress for three years and create new policies to prevent skewing hiring to younger workers.
Targeting hiring practices is more difficult to prove than discrimination claims brought by current employees. Unsuccessful job applicants often do not file suit. In 2016, there were 2,000 claims of age bias in the hiring process and 10,000 claims from current workers against their employers.
Meanwhile, courts of appeals are split on whether companies can be held liable for discriminating against older job seekers. This month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit said job applicants can pursue claims against employers. The Eleventh Circuit came to the opposite conclusion in 2016.
The Seasons 52 complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleged that since 2010 Seasons 52, owned by Florida-based Darden Restaurant Inc., discriminated against older applicants for positions such as servers, hosts and bartenders.
The hiring managers allegedly told candidates they preferred “younger and fresher” applicants or called older workers “too experienced.”
The restaurant denied the claims in the complaint and under the terms of the settlement did not admit any wrongdoing. Lawyers from Seyfarth Shaw and Akerman represented Darden. A Seyfarth attorney did not respond to request for comment.
The EEOC also presented statistical analysis from an economist that found the makeup of the workforce could not be possible with neutral policies, EEOC trial attorney Kristen Foslid said Thursday.
Daniel Seltzer, an EEOC lawyer, said the anecdotal evidence included questions and comments about age. The hiring policies themselves were not the issue, but in some cases questions about dates of birth, lifestyle and health were asked, the attorneys said.
The job applicants, age 40 and older, who applied to Seasons 52 at the 35 restaurants that opened since 2010, will receive compensation through the settlement. So far, there are 250 class members and more will be able to file suit, Foslid said.
The parties agreed to hire Fred Alvarez, of counsel to Jones Day, to serve as the independent compliance monitor. The Silicon Valley-based lawyer will monitor compliance with the settlement terms.
Alvarez focuses on compliance advice, conducting internal investigations and serving as a court-appointed monitor of class action decrees. During the Reagan administration, he served as assistant secretary of labor, managing the department's wage-and-hour division and the federal contract compliance program office. He also formerly served as an EEOC commissioner.
Robert Weisberg, an EEOC lawyer, said the attorneys involved in the Seasons 52 case agreed on Alvarez based on his past work on compliance matters in significant discrimination cases.
The consent decree is posted below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250