Jay-Z's Attorney Says SEC Pursuit of Open-Ended Testimony a 'Celebrity Hunt'
Last week, the SEC filed suit against the world-famous rapper in the Southern District of New York, requesting the court compel him to testify in an investigation over the company he sold his Rocawear clothing line to in 2007.
May 07, 2018 at 12:48 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Jay-Z may be a business, man, as his lyrics say, but his attorney, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan partner Alex Spiro, says the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has no business requesting an open-ended interview process with the rapper with no concrete limit on the artist and entrepreneur's time.
Regulators' attempts now to compel Jay-Z through a court order raise “serious questions about whether this exercise has transcended any investigative purpose and crossed over into a celebrity hunt,” Spiro stated in a filing Monday.
According to Spiro, he spent the weekend working on a solution to appease regulators by providing his client, whose given name is Shawn Carter, for questioning for a single day. In his filing Monday, Spiro said the SEC's pursuit of Carter simply made no sense, amounting to an onerous and unnecessary overreach.
At issue is the SEC's investigation into clothing brand management company Iconix's purchase of Carter's Rocawear clothing brand back in 2007 for $204 million. At the time, Iconix said Jay-Z would remain involved with the brand, namely through a number of joint ventures, according to the SEC.
In 2016, Iconix said in a financial statement that it suffered a reduction in assets and income to its Rocawear-related assets of $169 million in 2015. In the following year's filing, the company announced another $34.6 million in losses related to the Rocawear brand. The SEC says it launched an investigation in 2015 into Iconix over potential securities violations, including fraud, related to Iconix's reporting on its intangible assets, which includes Rocawear.
According to regulators, they have twice attempted to subpoena Carter—”an important witness”—as part of the investigation. They say they want to discuss the value of Rocawear and his involvement with the brand after its sale, the joint ventures he was involved in with Iconix, transactions between Carter and Iconix, and what he may have known at certain times about what was going on at Iconix based on calls, emails and meetings he may have been at. Both times, they say, he refused to appear.
In his filing Monday, Spiro said that the SEC has, in fact, subpoenaed not only Carter but numerous business affiliates of his. On Feb. 6, 2017, regulators issued seven separate document subpoenas to Carter, his Roc Nation COO Desiree Perez, and five of his businesses. Spiro noted that the SEC has been provided with almost 11,000 pages of responsive material, and that Perez herself sat for a seven-hour day of testimony before the commission.
Carter, according to Spiro, is willing to sit for an interview with regulators, but the issue is one of timing. Whereas Carter will sit for a single day, the SEC, Spiro said, “insists” Carter “commit to continuing to testify for multiple days to the extent that the SEC wants to keep questioning him.” Having rejected Carter's attempts to provide the SEC with what it needs, including other members of Carter's business team with experience dealing with Iconix, the “single issue” of open-ended testimony has become “a deal breaker,” forcing Carter to oppose the motion, Spiro said.
An SEC press officer declined to comment on the state of negotiations between the parties.
Carter currently remains ordered to appear before U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe on Tuesday to show cause why he should not be compelled to testify.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Public-Private Dichotomy in State-Created Insurance Entities
- 2How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'It’s a Job About People, First and Foremost,' Says Alexander Lees of Milbank
- 3Morris Nichols Names New Chief Financial Officer
- 4People in the News—Jan. 24, 2025—Klehr Harrison, Willig Williams
- 5Best Practices for Conducting Workplace Investigations: A Legal and HR Perspective
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250