Uber CLO Explains Decision to Scrap Mandatory Arbitration Clauses and NDAs Around Sexual Harassment, Assault
Tony West of Uber explained the rationale behind his company's announcement of new policies on how it deals with claims of sexual harassment and assault.
May 15, 2018 at 06:01 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Uber Technologies Inc. is taking steps to make it easier for survivors of sexual harassment and assault to come forward and make their voices heard.
The San Francisco-based ride-hailing company announced Tuesday morning it would eliminate the requirement of arbitration clauses for any employee, driver or rider who says they have experienced sexual harassment or assault. And it will not require any survivors to sign on to nondisclosure agreements if they wish to speak out about their claims.
“As we look at ways to improve the safety of the Uber platform, you really can't do everything to enhance the safety without dealing with sexual harassment and assault,” Uber chief legal officer Tony West said in an interview with Corporate Counsel before the announcement.
“What's important to us is making sure we're helping to facilitate victims to choose the venue of redress where they will seek some sort of justice whether through mediation, arbitration or open court,” he explained.
The announcement comes about two weeks after a CNN investigation revealed more than 100 Uber drivers have been accused of sexually assaulting or abusing passengers in the last four years.
The recent CNN piece prompted Sen. Richard Blumenthal to put pressure on Uber to end the practice of arbitration clauses.
“Claims subject to forced arbitration are relegated to private forums where powerful defendants can stack the deck against claimants and cover up wrongdoing,” Blumenthal wrote in a May 2 letter to Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi.
Abuse by drivers is a known issue for Uber, and a class action was filed last year that alleged widespread sexual assault by drivers and demanded change from the company.
In response to Tuesday morning's announcement, Jeanne Christensen, a partner at Wigdor LLP, the firm that brought the class action, congratulated Uber in a statement for “choosing not to silence survivors.”
“Our hope is that Uber ending forced arbitration for victims of sexual assault will begin a process to reduce future suffering by women passengers,” the statement said. Christensen added that despite this “critical step,” she believes Uber still needs to remove barriers to survivors proceeding together as a class to bring claims.
In his interview with Corporate Counsel, West explained that since joining the company in late November, he and Khosrowshahi have been working to find ways “to do the right thing.”
One way it has decided to separate the company from any questionable behavior is to address the issue of sexual harassment.
“This is not a response to that [the CNN report],” West said. “These conversations started long before that—from the Susan Fowler blog post, to the #MeToo movement, to the context we are living in. In raising these issues, and rightfully so, we want to have the ability to have this conversation in a meaningful way with external shareholders.”
West addressed the fact that some may argue the removal of arbitration clauses “doesn't go far enough.” He anticipates that some individuals want the removal of arbitration clauses to extend to matters of gender or race discrimination. He said those are avenues the company will explore further, but the focus right now is on sexual harassment and assault.
“That's both because of the safety component, as well as the fact that we have heard repeatedly that the most important thing is to give individual survivors the forum they choose to press forward with individual claims and options to tell their story if that's what they choose to do,” he said.
In addition to removing the arbitration clause for survivors, Uber will give them the chance to settle their claims with the company without any NDA or confidentiality provision that restricts how they speak about the incidents.
“We think it's important for that decision to rest with survivors,” West said, adding that Uber “will not stand in the way” of how survivors decide to tell their stories.
The third piece of Uber's strategy to curb sexual abuse is its commitment to publish a transparency report, using data it collects from reports of sexual harassment or assault on the company's platform.
“No company or transportation agency has done that before,” West said.
He is hopeful that the reporting will lead to other companies doing the same. West said that Uber has had conversations with dozens of women's groups to discuss what Uber and other businesses can do to reduce the number of assaults.
Uber has also hired advisers from the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, the National Network to End Domestic Violence and the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, according to a company blog post published by West early Tuesday.
At least on the mandatory arbitration front, Uber is not the first company to shift its policies in the wake of the #MeToo movement. Fellow tech company Microsoft Corp. announced last December that it would do away with mandatory arbitration for those employees who claim they've experienced sexual harassment.
This story has been updated to include comment from Wigdor LLP.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAn ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Travis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Does The Treasury Hack Underscore a Big Problem for the Private Sector?
- 2Gen AI Legal Tech Startup Eve Raises $47 Million Series A investment
- 3Hicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
- 4Buchalter Opens in Chicago With 25 Lawyers, Staff
- 5Assessing the Second Trump Presidency’s Impact on College Sports
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250