Daily Dicta: Two Bad Doctors, One Enormous Payout and a Lesson Still Waiting to Be Learned
Michigan State University on Wednesday agreed to pay $500 million to settle claims by sexual assault victims of sports doctor Lawrence G. Nassar. Apparently USC has not learned from MSU's mistakes.
May 17, 2018 at 01:50 PM
7 minute read
Michigan State University on Wednesday agreed to pay $500 million to settle claims by sexual assault victims of sports doctor Lawrence G. Nassar. But if there's one consolation to the horrific case, it's this: A message is being sent, loud and clear.
Right?
John Manly of Manly, Stewart & Finaldi, who represents many of the victims, said as much to The New York Times. “It is the sincere hope of all of the survivors that the legacy of this settlement will be far-reaching institutional reform that will end the threat of sexual assault in sports, schools and throughout our society.”
So here's my question: What in the world is USC thinking?
Seriously. How do the people who run the University of Southern California not get it?
On Tuesday, the Los Angeles Times published an in-depth investigative report on Dr. George Tyndall, who for nearly 30 years was the only full-time gynecologist at USC's health care clinic.
“The complaints began in the 1990s, when co-workers alleged he was improperly photographing students' genitals,” according to the story. “In the years that followed, patients and nursing staff accused him again and again of 'creepy' behavior, including touching women inappropriately during pelvic exams and making sexually suggestive remarks about their bodies.”
Keep in mind that many of his patients were 18, 19, 20, and had never been to an ob-gyn before. They didn't know what was normal or what to expect.
The details of his exams are, for lack of a better word, icky (“He would put one finger in and say, 'Oh, I think it will fit. Let's put two fingers in,'” said a chaperone who worked with Tyndall for years. Four people familiar with Tyndall's exams said that while he spoke, he was moving his fingers in and out of the patients.”)
Tell me there's not a very large lawsuit in USC's future. Especially when you consider how the school handled the complaints.
After years of allegedly ignoring the information, top administrators in 2016 let the doctor “resign quietly with a financial payout,” according to the story.
That's right, they paid him.
Per the Times, USC “did not inform Tyndall's patients. Nor did USC report him at the time to the Medical Board of California, the agency responsible for protecting the public from problem doctors.”
Penn State has paid out more than $100 million to settle claims related to abuse by assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky. At Michigan State, it's now $500 million for Dr. Nassar.
I wonder what it's going to cost USC? And just how much more it will take for other schools to get the message.
|
What's the Opposite of Litigator of the Week?
A nasty video went viral on Wednesday showing a man in a midtown Manhattan restaurant having a tantrum because two employees were speaking Spanish.
“Your staff is speaking Spanish to customers when they should be speaking English….It's America,” the man said to the manager of Fresh Kitchen in Midtown. “And my guess is that they're not documented so my next call is to ICE to have each one of them kicked out of my country. If they have the balls to come here and live off of my money—I pay for their welfare, I pay for their ability to be here.”
The man has been identified by publications including The New York Daily News as business and commercial litigator Aaron Schlossberg, who runs the two-lawyer Law Offices of Aaron Schlossberg.
I couldn't independently verify it was Schlossberg in the video (though it looks like him based on his law firm photo), and he did not return a call seeking comment. He's apparently not talking to other publications either.
If it isn't Schlossberg in the video, he's making a terrible blunder by not correcting the record immediately. And if it is him, well, the internet is getting its revenge.
His firm had more than 1,100 Yelp reviews by Wednesday evening, virtually all one star, including a few that reviewed him as a Mexican restaurant. Another post includes his New York Bar registration number and the disciplinary committee's contact information. Yelp users also added images to his profile including a pig, a pile of garbage and a bottle of douche.
(Yelp has an alert on his page stating that “This business recently made waves in the news, which often means that people come to this page to post their views on the news.”)
His public Facebook page has been hit hard too. “If you are in the market for a lawyer who is openly racist in one of the most diverse cities in the world, are you in luck!” is one of the more polite messages.
Another commenter observed that Schlossberg, who got his JD from GW Law School in 2002, “showed his true colors and was caught on camera, and shall now be forever haunted by the power of the internet.”
I suspect that may be true—and it's a good reminder. In the era of cell phone videos and twitter, all it takes is one (thoroughly unpleasant) lunchtime rant to ruin your career.
Caveat laterals: Two lawyers said a boutique induced them to join based on false promises and then wrongly obtained more than $700,000 in profits from their legal work.
Next week marks the one-year anniversary of the decision. Time flies when you're fighting over venues for patent litigation.
Standing across a desk from prosecutor Jeannie Rhee, a visibly upset Eric Dubelier of Reed Smith described her account of the events as “bullshit.”
“These are defendants who lied and broke the law in order to spread malicious lies against Planned Parenthood,” said Arnold & Porter's Amy Bomse. “We're looking forward to having our case proceed to trial.”
A whopping 53 firms requested fees—not exactly the lean leadership team that the judge had asked for.
Meanwhile, Judge Edward Davila signs off on a coalition approach in suits against Apple. Let the fee fights begin!
Her husband, who drowned during the Philadelphia Triathlon's half-mile swim, signed a waiver—but can his widow still sue for wrongful death?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Reporter and a Mayor: Behind the Scenes During the Eric Adams Indictment News Cycle
Of Predictive Analytics and Robots: A First-Year Federal Judge's Thoughts on AI
A Hearing Grappling With Tom Girardi's Memory Sends the Lit Daily Looking to the Past
The High Art of Keeping Big Law Worker Bees Pleased (Or at Least Pleased Enough Not to Leave)
Trending Stories
- 1HSF and Kramer Levin Leaders Set Out Merger Timeline, Structure
- 2'Don't Be Afraid to Dumb It Down': Top Fed Magistrate Judge Gives Tips on Explaining Complex Discovery Disputes
- 3Doctrine of ‘Practical Location,’ Breach of a Commercial Lease: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
- 4Supreme Court Asked to Review Issues of Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement
- 5Defense Verdict: Alston & Bird Beat Back $35M Claim Against Nokia
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250