Ruth Bader Ginsburg Expresses Support for New Law Clerk Hiring Plan
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke favorably of the plan last week during a meeting of the Federal Judges Association in Washington. Justice Elena Kagan said she supports the two-year pilot plan and will "take into account" in her own hiring whether judges and law schools comply with it.
May 18, 2018 at 12:43 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2015. Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ ALM
Updated 3:47 p.m.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently became the second justice to voice support publicly for the new federal law clerk hiring plan.
Ginsburg spoke favorably of the plan last week during a meeting of the Federal Judges Association in Washington, Tthe National Law Journal confirmed through a spokesperson for the high court.
Last month, Justice Elena Kagan said she supports the two-year pilot plan and will “take into account” in her own hiring whether judges and law schools comply with it. Kagan spoke favorably of the program April 30 at the annual meeting of the 7th Circuit Bar Association. In her remarks, she described the chaos surrounding the former hiring process.
The new plan is the work of the Ad Hoc Committee on Law Clerk Hiring, led by Chief Judges Merrick Garland of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit; Robert Katzmann of the Second Circuit; Sidney Thomas of the Ninth Circuit and Diane Wood of the Seventh Circuit. Their circuit court websites announce they are following the new plan.
The deans of more than 100 law schools endorsed, in a letter published in September, the effort to move the clerkship hiring to a date after the completion of a law student's second year.
That is what the new hiring plan does. Starting with students who entered law school in 2017, the application and hiring process will not begin until after a law student's second year.
Judges will not seek or accept formal or informal clerkship applications, seek or accept formal or informal recommendations, conduct formal or informal interviews, or make any offers before June 17, 2019. For those students who enter law school in 2018, the starting date will be June 15, 2020.
Trevor Morrison, dean of New York University School of Law, spearheaded the law school letter with Yale Law School Dean Heather Gerken. The signatories said the “accelerated hiring schedule” in recent years “undermined our faculties' ability to provide judges with the information they need to make wise hiring choices.”
Morrison told The National Law Journal last week he is hopeful support from influential judges, including those on the Supreme Court, will have an impact on the willingness of law schools and judges to follow the plan.
Heather GerkenGerken said in a statement Friday:
“I am pleased to see such strong support building for the new law clerk hiring plan as it offers tremendous advantages for students and makes great sense for judges too. This plan would allow students, faculty, and hiring judges the time they need to acquire the information that is required to make these critically important decisions. Yale Law School has long been a leader in the campaign to reform the clerkship hiring process. As Dean, I am committed to ensuring that we see these reforms through.”
Whether all of the deans who signed the September letter will urge their faculties to abide by the new plan is not yet known.
Stanford Law School Dean Elizabeth Magill on May 11 announced expectations on the path forward:
“I have advised faculty not to write letters of recommendations for 1L students and not to place calls to judges to advocate for those students. Acting in good faith—on the expectation of the full participation of other law schools in the interests of all of our students—we have assured our students in the Class of 2020 that they need not and should not begin the clerkship application process. We will do everything we can to make sure that those judges who participate in the plan will not be disadvantaged by that commitment. To this end, we strongly encourage judges and circuits to identify themselves as participating in the plan, just as law schools have identified themselves as supporting institutions.”
OSCAR, the portal for clerk applications and recommendations, has an adjusted application release date to be consistent with the new plan. After June 2020, judges who participated will reconsider the pilot plan.
This report was updated with additional comment about the law clerk plan.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250