Ninth Circuit Pumps the Brakes on Facebook Biometric Trial
The Ninth Circuit has granted an emergency motion by Facebook Inc. in its bid to defeat a privacy class action over biometric data.
May 29, 2018 at 03:51 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
Facebook Inc. headquarters. (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM)
SAN FRANCISCO — The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has put the brakes on a class action privacy lawsuit against Facebook Inc. that had been set to go to trial in July.
In an order signed by Ninth Circuit Judges William Fletcher and Consuelo Callahan Tuesday, the court granted an emergency motion for interlocutory review of an April class certification ruling. That ruling certified a class of Illinois Facebook users bringing claims under the state's Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) over Facebook's photo scanning technology.
The judge presiding over the case is U.S. District Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California. Lawyers for Facebook at Mayer Brown had asked Donato to delay the trial, set to begin July 9, so they could seek Ninth Circuit review. But Donato earlier on Tuesday refused that request.
In the underlying lawsuit, plaintiffs claim Facebook's “tag suggestions” feature, a tool launched in 2011 that prompts users with possible matches of friends to identify in uploaded pictures BIPA requires companies to get permission before storing personal identifiers like fingerprints and face and retina scans and disclose how they use them.
The law carries statutory damages of $1,000 for each negligent violation, and $5,000 for those that are “intentional and reckless,” meaning that a verdict against Facebook could hit the company with billions in damages. Facebook had the backing of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in seeking interlocutory review.
Plaintiffs are represented in the case by Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd and Labaton Sucharow. Paul Gelller of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd said in an email statement that while he was looking forward to trial in July, he was still confident that his clients would get their day in court. “This is just one more hurdle we have to clear,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
