EEOC Sues Walmart for Alleged Discrimination Against Two Deaf Employees
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, accused Walmart management of failing to provide accommodations for two workers who are deaf.
June 01, 2018 at 06:29 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Updated 9:39 p.m.
A Walmart store in Washington discriminated against two deaf workers, keeping them from important workplace communication and denying access to translators or comprehensive note-taking for meetings, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleged in a lawsuit filed Friday.
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, accused Walmart management of failing to accommodate two workers, Troy Miles and Tonya Bland, who communicate primarily through sign language. Miles and Bland worked at a Walmart Supercenter location in northwest Washington.
The lawsuit claimed Miles, who worked in the store from June 2014 to August 2017 as a sales associate and manager, was not given accommodations to, among other things, participate in meetings, including daily meetings for department managers. The complaint alleged Miles requested access to sign language interpreting or comprehensive note-taking for certain meetings.
“The unlawful employment practices complained of herein were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Miles,” according to the lawsuit.
Walmart is represented by Littler Mendelson attorneys Dorothy Young and Randi Halbert. The attorneys were not reached for comment. A Walmart spokesman said in a statement: “We do not tolerate discrimination of any kind. We take this seriously and will respond appropriately to the complaint.”
Bland worked in the Washington store from September 2013 to August 2016 as an overnight stocker. She was not provided access to sign language or detailed written notes for meetings and trainings, including new employee orientation, daily group meetings and one-on-one meetings related to personnel matters, according to the lawsuit.
“Bland repeatedly made it known to management that, without accommodations, she could not understand the information being presented. Accommodations requested by Bland that were denied to her included access to ASL interpreting and closed-captioning for video presentations,” the EEOC's lawsuit claimed.
In addition to compensation for the workers, the EEOC is seeking an injunction against Walmart against refusing to accommodate an individual with a disability and an order requiring the company to institute and carry out policies, practices and programs for equal employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities.
The EEOC in September sued a Walmart store in Wisconsin for alleged discrimination against an employee who is deaf and visually impaired.
“Employers have a legal obligation under federal law to work with employees who need accommodations for disabilities,” Gregory Gochanour, regional attorney for the EEOC's Chicago District, said in a statement then. “When companies shirk that obligation, the EEOC will fight to uphold the rights of people with disabilities.”
Walmart, represented by MWH Law Group, has denied the charges.
Read the Washington, D.C., complaint below:
Update: This report was updated with comment about the lawsuit.
➤➤ Get employment law news and commentary straight to your in-box with Labor of Law, a new Law.com briefing. Learn more and sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTravis Lenkner Returns to Burford Capital With an Eye on Future Growth Opportunities
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar With Saul' Part V: Strange Days of Trump Trial Culminate in Historic Verdict
1 minute readLegal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part IV: Deliberations Begin in First Trump Criminal Trial
1 minute readJosh Partington of Snell & Wilmer Is in Fact a Rock Star in the Office (and Out of It)
1 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250