Former Bingham Partner Sues Cotchett Firm and Ex-Partner Claiming They Botched Multimillion-Dollar Compensation Case
Former Bingham partner Michael DiSanto claims that Cotchett and former partner Philip Gregory mishandled an arbitration where he was seeking millions of dollars in unpaid guaranteed compensation from the firm. He lost counterclaims forcing him to hand over stock units from his prior employer to Bingham.
June 01, 2018 at 05:16 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A former Bingham McCutchen partner has slapped his former lawyers at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy with a multimillion-dollar professional negligence lawsuit, claiming they mishandled an arbitration where he was seeking millions in unpaid compensation guarantees from his old law firm.
In a complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court on May 24, lawyers for former Bingham partner Michael DiSanto claims he had a written agreement with the firm that guaranteed him $2.5 million in annual compensation from when he joined in March 2013 through 2015, and at least $1.5 million in 2016, including salary and bonus.
According to the complaint, DiSanto hired the Cotchett firm and Philip Gregory, then a partner at Cotchett, shortly after DiSanto says he was terminated without cause in November 2014. Gregory was hired to pursue claims in arbitration against Bingham for failure to make good on the compensation agreement. DiSanto claims Gregory and the firm negligently mishandled his case and lost counterclaims that resulted in him having to hand over stock units he had been awarded by his prior employer, Maker Studios, where he previously served as general counsel.
DiSanto is seeking at least $3 million dollars for claims of professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty against Gregory and Cotchett regarding his affirmative claims against Bingham and at least $3.7 million stemming from the loss on the stock counterclaims, according to the complaint.
Neither Gregory, who left Cotchett to start his own firm in February, nor name partner Joseph Cotchett immediately responded to multiple requests for comment on the allegations in the lawsuit.
According to his LinkedIn page, DiSanto is currently the chief administrative and legal officer at Limelight Networks. He also has stints at Dinsmore & Shohl, Reed Smith, Morrison & Foerster, Shearman & Sterling and the firm now known as Cooley on his LinkedIn resume. He was let go from Bingham the same month that roughly 750 lawyers and staffers from the firm were absorbed into Morgan, Lewis & Bockius.
According to the lawsuit, the defendants' work for DiSanto “fell below the standard of care.” DiSanto claims that Cotchett and Gregory failed to pursue discovery or interview potential witnesses that would have been beneficial to his claims against the firm, including other Bingham partners or the firm's head of recruiting who allegedly knew about his guaranteed compensation agreement. DiSanto claims that it was him and not his lawyers who contacted the recruiter he worked with when joining Bingham to get a declaration regarding his deal with the firm.
“Defendants did not allocate sufficient resources to handle plaintiff's matter competently,” Disanto's lawyers wrote. “Gregory did not, and on information and belief, was unable to, allocate a sufficient level of time and attention to be able to before consistently with the standard of care. This problem was exacerbated by defendants' failure to adequately staff plaintiff's case.”
DiSanto claims that the defendants' work product was “shoddy, poorly written, omitted important arguments and evidence” and was often only given to him to review at the last minute. He also said that his lawyer failed to prepare him to testify and didn't object to Bingham's counterclaims on the basis that the parties hadn't attempted to mediate them first as required.
“The failure by defendants to timely and properly assert this objection deprived plaintiff of the opportunity to settle the matter before an interim award was entered against him,” DiSanto's lawyers wrote.
DiSanto claims that the restricted stock units granted to him by Maker Studios rightfully belonged to him, but that the defendants failed to procure discovery and witnesses at his old employer to defend against Bingham's counterclaims.
DiSanto is represented by Asim Bhansali and Kate Lazarus of Kwun Bhansali Lazarus. DiSanto, Bhansali and Lazarus, who left Keker, Van Nest & Peters last month to launch a litigation boutique with colleague Michael Kwun, didn't immediately respond to messages.
Likewise, DiSanto didn't immediately respond to a message left at his office on Friday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBeating Beats: A Q&A With the Susman Lawyer Behind the $25M Verdict Against Dr. Dre and Jimmy Iovine
Samsung Hit With Half-Billion-Dollar Verdict in Latest Apple Patent Trial
5 minute readIn Former Engineer's Harassment Suit, Uber's Decision to Scrap Arbitration Gets Its First Test
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250