Norton Rose Fulbright Faces $1.2M Asset Seizure in Venezuelan Dispute
A Northern Virginia-based Venezuelan attorney has been battling the firm for two decades over benefits he says he was denied after being fired from predecessor Macleod Dixon.
June 27, 2018 at 05:54 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Venezuela's highest court last week delivered welcome news to a U.S.-based attorney who has spent years battling Norton Rose Fulbright and its predecessor law firm in the South American country.
The Social Chamber of the Venezuelan Supreme Tribunal on June 21 ordered the preventative seizure of nearly $1.2 million in assets from Norton Rose Fulbright—the latest ruling in an employment dispute with attorney Omar Garcia Bolivar that has been tied up in the courts for nearly two decades.
The court had already ruled on the question of seizing the international law firm's assets three times before. But this time, it converted the sum in question from Venezuelan bolivars to U.S. dollars. That is a significant finding in a country where inflation has been estimated at nearly 25,000 percent.
Garcia Bolivar—currently the Northern Virginia-based president of BG Consulting, which advises governments on growing private-sector investment—is still waiting on a final resolution to his litigation against the firm. He claims he is still owed social benefits after being fired from Macleod Dixon, which was absorbed by Norton Rose in 2012. Garcia Bolivar joined the firm when it opened its doors in Caracas in 1997 with a focus on oil and gas work.
“It's probably one of the longest trials in the history of Venezuela,” Garcia Bolivar said.
Garcia Bolivar took Macleod Dixon to court in Venezuela for the nonpayment of social benefits in 2000, as did his brother, Emilio Garcia Bolivar, who also joined the firm in 1997 and resigned in 2000. But both cases crawled forward. A 2015 ruling from the United Nations Human Rights Committee, in a case brought by Emilio Garcia Bolivar, detailed the explanation for the delays, at least from the brothers' perspective: According to the facts as submitted by Emilio, there were multiple overlapping connections between the law firm, the court and the Venezuelan government.
In 2015, the U.N. tribunal ruled in Emilio Garcia Bolivar's favor, concluding that the proceedings in the case were “unduly delayed” and that the court was obligated to deliver a swift ruling.
According to Omar Garcia Bolivar, following that ruling, the proceedings in his brother's case in Venezuela began to accelerate, but neither one has reached a resolution. Omar Garcia Bolivar has asked the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to find that he has been the victim of delayed justice, and says a ruling in that case could come down at any moment.
Meanwhile, although the Supreme Tribunal has yet to touch the merits of Garcia Bolivar's case, it has been acting on his efforts to seize Norton Rose Fulbright's assets in the event of a possible judgment. The first ruling, from 2012, and subsequent ones, most recently last August, denominated the obligation in bolivars. Last week's ruling, in dollars, references Garcia Bolivar's initial demand of $454,000, doubled, with the addition of nearly $300,000 (or 30 percent) in fees. That's the statutory maximum for preventive measures under Venezuelan law.
“In principle, it's supposed to cover for the capital plus the interest plus any legal expenses,” Garcia Bolivar said, noting that the figure he is entitled to at this point would likely exceed $1.2 million.
Garcia Bolivar added that in response to the previous orders, Norton Rose Fulbright has provided a bank guarantee to ward off a potential seizure, but the firm has not yet done so in U.S. dollars for the latest ruling. He said that as a result, he has petitioned for the seizure of firm assets both inside and outside of Venezuela.
Also a possibility, if the case is not resolved, is a move for sanctions under the executive order of the U.S. government initially ordered by the Obama administration and advanced under the Trump administration. These could apply to Venezuelan officials, but also businesses and officials, including foreigners, involved indirectly in human rights violations.
“Here we have tangible evidence that there was a violation of human rights by Venezuela,” he said.
But Garcia Bolivar said that he hoped his underlying case was in its last stages, explaining that some final witness testimony was expected in the next couple of weeks and that a decision could come down in the next several months.
A spokesman for Norton Rose Fulbright did not respond to multiple requests for comment.
The case represents just one strand of a complex web of relations that the firm has in Venezuela. Canadian senior partner James Coleman is the executive director and chair of mining company Gold Reserve Inc., which invested millions of dollars in a gold and copper project in the country's southeast. After the Venezuelan government, under previous president Hugo Chavez, revoked the company's authorization in 2008, the company took the country to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and secured a $740 million arbitration award.
In June 2017, Gold Reserve and Venezuela settled the matter for a total of $1.03 billion, which included the award, interest and the sale of the company's mining data. But Gold Reserve says that after paying $187.5 million into a trust account, the country missed required payments for December 2017 and January through May 2018, totaling approximately $177 million.
Norton Rose Fulbright has also represented ConocoPhillips and other energy companies in a number of big-ticket international arbitrations involving the Venezuelan government and state-owned enterprises.
The firm, which lists 27 attorneys in Caracas on its website, is one of a small number of international players remaining in the country, amid political turbulence and economic calamity. President Nicolás Maduro recently claimed a second term in an election that the opposition viewed as rigged. Meanwhile, the country's economy is in shambles, with sky-high inflation, and migrants streaming across the borders to Colombia and Brazil.
Hogan Lovells earlier this year shuttered its office in Caracas, and in 2016 DLA Piper abandoned its Venezuela presence, ending a five-year-old formal alliance with Venezuelan firm InterJuris Abogados.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWith DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
7 minute readLitigators of the Week: Ingersoll Rand Enforces a Noncompete Against an Exec Who Jumped Ship to Verboten Competitor
Trending Stories
- 1DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 2Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 3Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
- 4Divided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
- 5From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250