Daily Dicta: In Charlottesville Suit, Robbie Kaplan and Karen Dunn Don't Scare Easy
Suing white supremacists is not for the faint of heart—but star litigators Roberta Kaplan and Karen Dunn are not backing down.
July 11, 2018 at 01:16 PM
7 minute read
Representing 11 people who were injured in Charlottesville last August, they scored a big first-round win when a federal judge in Virginia on Monday refused to dismiss their suit against 24 of 25 defendants, including Richard Spencer , Andrew Anglin , the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazi groups and James Fields , the man who drove his car into counter-protestors. “The First Amendment does not protect violence,” wrote Senior U.S. District Judge Norman Moon of the Western District of Virginia on Monday in a powerful 62-page decision . “I think about how proud my grandma would be if she knew I was doing this,” said Dunn, a partner at Boies Schiller Flexner and former federal prosecutor in Virginia (and one of The American Lawyer's Litigators of the Year in 2017). “Karen is the only lawyer I've ever met who is tougher than I am,” said Kaplan, who left Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison last year to found what's now known as Kaplan Hecker & Fink. “There's no one I'd rather walk into court with.” Kaplan, who represented Edie Windsor in the landmark SCOTUS case on gay marriage, is no stranger to hot-button cases. But this suit, which alleges the defendants formed a conspiracy to commit racial violence, is something else. The vitriol directed at her personally has been “incredibly scary,” Kaplan said. That she's a New Yorker, a woman, a lesbian, hardly seems to register. “What the far right cares about the most is the fact that I'm Jewish,” Kaplan said, describing the anti-Semitism as virulent. “There was nothing in Windsor that even approached” such personal attacks. Still, neither she nor Dunn are particularly surprised at the hate speech. “It's what this case is about,” Dunn said. The plaintiffs want monetary damages for their physical and emotional injuries, as well as a ban on similar violent and threatening gatherings in the future. The litigation is being funded by the non-profit Integrity First for America, but the litigators are working at a reduced rate. Also on the team is Cooley's Alan Levine. “I was sitting next to him in synagogue,” Kaplan said, and realized “He's the best person I know to depose Nazis.” (An unusual compliment, to be sure.) Kaplan and Dunn, however, had never actually met before the case, though they knew of each other by reputation. “Since then, it's become very clear that we work extremely well together as a team. It's very serendipitous,” Dunn said. Kaplan conceived of the case after being deeply moved by images of the Charlottesville violence. Wanting to take action, she recalled an old suit by former Paul Weiss colleagues Maria Vullo, and Martin London on behalf of Planned Parenthood. They sued anti-abortion activists who posted photos and home addresses of doctors who performed abortions, with red “X”s over the ones who had been injured or killed. The successful theory in that case was that the anti-abortion activists were inciting violence. In Charlottesville, Kaplan and Dunn are trying something similar—alleging a conspiracy to commit violence. So far, the judge is buying it. Moon, who is 82 and was appointed by President Bill Clinton, starts his opinion with an examination of a law that had been all but relegated to the dustbin: an 1871 statute known as the Ku Klux Klan Act “directed at the organized terrorism in the Reconstruction South.” It's suddenly relevant again. Going defendant by defendant, Moon concluded that the plaintiffs “have adequately pled specific factual allegations” that each defendant except one “was part of a conspiracy to engage in racially motivated violence at the 'Unite the Right' events.” Notably, Moon ruled that when Fields ran over protestors with his car, killing one, it was “consistent with the conspiracy's avowed goal” and reasonably foreseeable. “Accordingly, plaintiffs have plausibly alleged that these co-conspirator defendants may be held liable for the overt act Fields took in furtherance of the conspiracy,” he held. He also rejected their First Amendment defense. “[S]ome of the Defendants' behavior certainly was protected by the First Amendment,” the judge wrote. But free speech doesn't shield violence. “Plaintiffs plausibly allege that the defendants formed just such a conspiracy to commit violence, and so the First Amendment does not protect defendants.” Kaplan and Dunn said they expect the case to go to trial. “There is not any settlement to be had,” Dunn said. “We don't expect to fully recover damages from these defendants,” Kaplan added. “But our clients want justice.” |
What I'm Reading
'Something Went Horribly Wrong, but Nothing Was Done' Ex-Wilson Elser Partner Says in Dispute with Firm Former partner Kym Cushing said the stress of his position became too much, and he was in a "drunken stupor" when he deposited firm funds in his personal account. 2nd Circuit Reverses Order on Cravath to Produce Documents for Foreign Litigation “If foreign clients have reason to fear disclosing all pertinent documents to U.S. counsel, the likely results are bad legal advice to the client, and harm to our system of litigation.” Judge OKs MDL Claims Against Monsanto, Says Plaintiffs Face 'Daunting Challenge' of Tying Roundup to Cancer Monsanto Co. has lost out on an early bid to knock out more than 400 federal cases claiming that the active ingredient in its Roundup herbicide causes a type of cancer. Kavanaugh Doesn't 'Search for an Easy Answer,' Former Clerks Tell Senate “He masters every detail and rereads every precedent. He listens carefully to the views of his colleagues and clerks, even—indeed, especially—when they differ from his own,” wrote 34 former clerks—all of the clerks who are not prohibited by their current or pending employment from signing. Louisiana Judges Benched Amid Allegations of Sexual Assault, Groping One judge is accused of committing lewd and lascivious acts on two teenage girls. Federal Judge Tosses Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Against 'The Art of Fielding' Author Both works are about a struggling Division III college baseball team, and each tracks the team's progressions after the protagonist in each story joins the teams. “But that's the extent of the similarities,” Hellerstein wrote.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: Kirkland Fends Off Antitrust Claims for Thomson Reuters Against AI-Backed Start-Up
How Senior Litigators Are Dealing With the 'Biden Effect'
'Clear the Runway': Bill Lee's Longtime Focus on Succession Planning
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250