In Manafort Trial, Defense Lawyers Get Their Turn
U.S. prosecutors rested their case Monday against Paul Manafort, the first Mueller defendant to go to trial. Now it's the defense lawyers' turn in Virginia federal court. We'll learn a lot more Tuesday morning.
August 13, 2018 at 06:45 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Paul Manafort's defense lawyers will make a bid Tuesday to stop the tax and bank fraud trial of the former Trump campaign chairman from moving forward to jurors.
Manafort lawyer Richard Westling previewed the motion for acquittal—a routine move by defense attorneys—late Monday, arguing to U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III in Alexandria, Virginia, that the special counsel prosecutors had not met their burden in the case. Manafort's legal team also expects to tell the judge Tuesday whether it will call any witnesses or introduce evidence.
The defense is moving to acquit all counts in Manafort's indictment, but with “particular focus” on allegations related to the Federal Savings Bank, Westling said Monday. Manafort's defense faces an uphill climb; requests for acquittal are rarely granted. Prosecutors, arguing against such motions, urge judges to permit juries to weigh the evidence and witness credibility.
On allegations of tax fraud and Manafort's failure to report foreign bank accounts, Westling said the government failed to show the “necessary willfulness” in Manafort's actions.
The bid to end the case before it reaches jurors came immediately after the special counsel's lead prosecutor, Greg Andres, announced, “Your honor, the government rests.” Manafort was the first defendant to force Mueller's team to go to trial.
Several other defendants, including cooperating witness Rick Gates, a former Manafort business partner, pleaded guilty to various crimes. Manafort's attorneys, in their opening statements, said he misplaced trust in Gates. “The case rests squarely on the shoulders of this star witness,” Manafort lawyer Thomas Zehnle said at the trial's start.
The government called more than two dozen witnesses during the trial's first 10 days. The final witness who testified against Manafort: Paula Liss, a senior special agent at the U.S. Treasury Department, who had previously testified but returned to note that Manafort's consulting company had not filed disclosures of foreign bank accounts between 2011 and 2014.
Earlier in the afternoon, prosecutors questioned James Brennan, an executive at Federal Savings Bank, who testified that he felt pressure to approve millions of dollars in loans to Manafort. On Aug. 10, another executive at the bank testified that Stephen Calk, the bank's CEO, took a personal interest in lending to Manafort as he lobbied for position in the Trump administration.
After testifying about several “inconsistencies” in documents Manafort provided to the bank, Brennan recalled that “his recommendation was that the loan not be made.” Ultimately, however, he gave Manafort a rating that allowed him to receive millions of dollars from the bank.
When Andres asked whether he had a choice to clear Manafort for loans, Brennan replied, “No.”
“Because of Mr. Calk?” Andres asked.
“Because the loan was going through,” Brennan answered.
Read more:
Trump-Appointed Judge Uphold Robert Mueller's Appointment
Mueller's Interest in Skadden Presents Unique Crisis Management Challenge
Here's Emmet Flood's Williams & Connolly Financial Disclosure
Rick Gates Testimony Leads to Tense Exchange Between Judge, Prosecutor
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLitigators of the Week: A Knockout Blow to Latest FCC Net Neutrality Rules After ‘Loper Bright’
An ‘Indiana Jones Moment’: Mayer Brown’s John Nadolenco and Kelly Kramer on the 10-Year Legal Saga of the Bahia Emerald
Litigators of the Week: A Win for Homeless Veterans On the VA's West LA Campus
'The Most Peculiar Federal Court in the Country' Comes to Berkeley Law
Trending Stories
- 1Midsize Firm Bressler Amery Absorbs Austin Boutique, Gaining Four Lawyers
- 2Bill Would Allow Californians to Sue Big Oil for Climate-Linked Wildfires, Floods
- 3LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
- 4Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over FBI Raid at Wrong House
- 5What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250